آپ کی پیر کی بریفنگ: امریکہ اور چین کے درمیان ایک آزمائشی تبادلہ اس کے علاوہ، روس میں ولادیمیر پوتن کی جنگی داستان نے زور پکڑ لیا۔ امیلیا نیرنبرگ کی طرف سے
Source link
Tag: Briefing
-
Your Monday Briefing: A Testy Exchange Between the U.S. and ChinaAlso, Vladimir Putin’s war narrative takes hold in Russia.By Amelia Nierenberg
-
ITMA in Milan: Italy consulate holds briefing for textile companies
کراچی: کراچی میں اٹلی کے قونصل خانے کی سرپرستی میں ٹیکسٹائل انڈسٹری کے لیے ایک پریزنٹیشن کا اہتمام کیا گیا تاکہ انہیں آئندہ ایونٹ ITMA 2023 کے بارے میں بریف کیا جا سکے جو کہ 8 سے 14 جون 2023 تک میلان میں منعقد ہوگا۔
ITMA ہر چار سال بعد منعقد ہونے والی ٹیکسٹائل کی سب سے بڑی نمائش ہے۔ ITMA 2023 کا مقصد ایسی اختراعات کو اجاگر کرنا ہے جو ٹیکسٹائل اور گارمنٹس مینوفیکچررز کو اپنے کاروبار کو تبدیل کرنے اور بڑھانے میں مدد فراہم کریں گی۔
صدر ایسوسی ایشن آف اٹالین مشینری مینوفیکچررز (ACIMIT) Alex Zucchi نے ACIMIT کی جانب سے حاضرین کا خیرمقدم کیا اور ITMA سروسز کے ڈپٹی پروجیکٹ ڈائریکٹر Eileen Ng کو آئندہ نمائش اور پاکستان ٹیکسٹائل مینوفیکچرنگ انڈسٹری کے لیے ڈیجیٹلائزیشن اور پائیداری کے اثرات کے بارے میں بات کرنے کی دعوت دی۔
دی…
>>Join our Facebook page From top right corner. <<
-
BR\’s refresher: your morning briefing for the day
بزنس ریکارڈر آپ کے قیمتی وقت اور محنت کو بچانے کے لیے اسے پچھلے دن کی اہم اپ ڈیٹس کے طور پر جو کچھ نظر آتا ہے اسے مرتب کرکے اپنے قارئین کی مدد کرتا ہے۔
اپنے دن کی شروعات کرنے کے لیے آپ کو پڑھنی چاہیے سرفہرست کہانیاں یہ ہیں:
- اسٹیٹ بینک نے کلیدی شرح سود میں 300bps اضافہ کر دیا، اسے 20% تک لے جایا گیا
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- ایف او نے لیبیا میں کشتی ڈوبنے سے 7 پاکستانیوں کی ہلاکت کی تصدیق کردی
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- پاکستان میں سونے کی فی تولہ قیمت 9400 روپے تک پہنچ گئی۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- نئی تاریخی کم: روپیہ ایک اور ڈرامائی گراوٹ کا شکار، امریکی ڈالر کے مقابلے 285.09 پر بند ہوا۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- چین کی طرف سے قرض کی واپسی پر، اسٹیٹ بینک کے ذخائر میں 556 ملین ڈالر کا اضافہ ہوا، جو اب 3.81 بلین ڈالر پر پہنچ گیا ہے
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- بینکنگ، تیل اور گیس کے شعبوں کے لیڈ چارج کے طور پر KSE-100 میں 0.64 فیصد اضافہ ہوا۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- پاکستان اور آئی ایم ایف اگلے ہفتے تک عملے کی سطح کے معاہدے پر پہنچ جائیں گے، اسحاق ڈار
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- عدالت نے لیفٹیننٹ جنرل امجد شعیب (ر) کے خلاف مقدمہ خارج کر دیا
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- ایس ایس جی سی نے گیس کی قیمتوں میں 26.9 فیصد اضافے کا مطالبہ کر دیا۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- 300 یونٹس اور اس سے اوپر کا استعمال: کارڈز پر 3.39 روپے فی یونٹ اضافی سرچارج
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
>>Join our Facebook page From top right corner. <<
-
BR\’s refresher: your morning briefing for the day
بزنس ریکارڈر آپ کے قیمتی وقت اور محنت کو بچانے کے لیے اسے پچھلے دن کی اہم اپ ڈیٹس کے طور پر جو کچھ نظر آتا ہے اسے مرتب کرکے اپنے قارئین کی مدد کرتا ہے۔
اپنے دن کی شروعات کرنے کے لیے آپ کو پڑھنی چاہیے سرفہرست کہانیاں یہ ہیں:
- اسٹیٹ بینک نے کلیدی شرح سود میں 300bps اضافہ کر دیا، اسے 20% تک لے جایا گیا
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- ایف او نے لیبیا میں کشتی ڈوبنے سے 7 پاکستانیوں کی ہلاکت کی تصدیق کردی
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- پاکستان میں سونے کی فی تولہ قیمت 9400 روپے تک پہنچ گئی۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- نئی تاریخی کم: روپیہ ایک اور ڈرامائی گراوٹ کا شکار، امریکی ڈالر کے مقابلے 285.09 پر بند ہوا۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- چین کی طرف سے قرض کی واپسی پر، اسٹیٹ بینک کے ذخائر میں 556 ملین ڈالر کا اضافہ ہوا، جو اب 3.81 بلین ڈالر پر پہنچ گیا ہے
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- بینکنگ، تیل اور گیس کے شعبوں کے لیڈ چارج کے طور پر KSE-100 میں 0.64 فیصد اضافہ ہوا۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- پاکستان اور آئی ایم ایف اگلے ہفتے تک عملے کی سطح کے معاہدے پر پہنچ جائیں گے، اسحاق ڈار
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- عدالت نے لیفٹیننٹ جنرل امجد شعیب (ر) کے خلاف مقدمہ خارج کر دیا
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- ایس ایس جی سی نے گیس کی قیمتوں میں 26.9 فیصد اضافے کا مطالبہ کر دیا۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- 300 یونٹس اور اس سے اوپر کا استعمال: کارڈز پر 3.39 روپے فی یونٹ اضافی سرچارج
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
>>Join our Facebook page From top right corner. <<
-
BR\’s refresher: your morning briefing for the day
بزنس ریکارڈر آپ کے قیمتی وقت اور محنت کو بچانے کے لیے اسے پچھلے دن کی اہم اپ ڈیٹس کے طور پر جو کچھ نظر آتا ہے اسے مرتب کرکے اپنے قارئین کی مدد کرتا ہے۔
اپنے دن کی شروعات کرنے کے لیے آپ کو پڑھنی چاہیے سرفہرست کہانیاں یہ ہیں:
- اسٹیٹ بینک نے کلیدی شرح سود میں 300bps اضافہ کر دیا، اسے 20% تک لے جایا گیا
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- ایف او نے لیبیا میں کشتی ڈوبنے سے 7 پاکستانیوں کی ہلاکت کی تصدیق کردی
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- پاکستان میں سونے کی فی تولہ قیمت 9400 روپے تک پہنچ گئی۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- نئی تاریخی کم: روپیہ ایک اور ڈرامائی گراوٹ کا شکار، امریکی ڈالر کے مقابلے 285.09 پر بند ہوا۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- چین کی طرف سے قرض کی واپسی پر، اسٹیٹ بینک کے ذخائر میں 556 ملین ڈالر کا اضافہ ہوا، جو اب 3.81 بلین ڈالر پر پہنچ گیا ہے
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- بینکنگ، تیل اور گیس کے شعبوں کے لیڈ چارج کے طور پر KSE-100 میں 0.64 فیصد اضافہ ہوا۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- پاکستان اور آئی ایم ایف اگلے ہفتے تک عملے کی سطح کے معاہدے پر پہنچ جائیں گے، اسحاق ڈار
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- عدالت نے لیفٹیننٹ جنرل امجد شعیب (ر) کے خلاف مقدمہ خارج کر دیا
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- ایس ایس جی سی نے گیس کی قیمتوں میں 26.9 فیصد اضافے کا مطالبہ کر دیا۔
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
- 300 یونٹس اور اس سے اوپر کا استعمال: کارڈز پر 3.39 روپے فی یونٹ اضافی سرچارج
پڑھیں یہاں تفصیلات کے لیے
>>Join our Facebook page From top right corner. <<
-
MPs want in-camera briefing on militancy | The Express Tribune
اسلام آباد:
جیسا کہ پیر کو پارلیمنٹ کے دوسرے مشترکہ اجلاس میں قانون سازوں نے کالعدم تحریک طالبان پاکستان (ٹی ٹی پی) کی طرف سے دہشت گردانہ سرگرمیوں میں اضافے پر خطرے کی گھنٹی بجا دی، پیپلز پارٹی کے سینیٹر رضا ربانی نے مطالبہ کیا کہ عسکری قیادت عسکریت پسندوں کے ساتھ ناکام امن مذاکرات پر ان کیمرہ بریفنگ فراہم کرے۔ .
قومی اسمبلی کے سپیکر راجہ پرویز اشرف کی زیر صدارت مشترکہ اجلاس میں قانون سازوں نے عسکریت پسندوں کے ساتھ بات چیت کے فیصلے پر برہمی کا اظہار کیا اور مطالبہ کیا کہ عسکریت پسندی کی بحالی کی روشنی میں اس معاملے پر ان کیمرہ بریفنگ کے لیے فوجی قیادت کو ایوان میں مدعو کیا جائے۔ خیبر پختونخواہ۔
انہوں نے افسوس کا اظہار کیا کہ سیکیورٹی کی ابھرتی ہوئی صورتحال صوبے میں کاروباروں اور تجارتی برادریوں کو ہڑپ کرنے کے لیے خطرہ بن رہی ہے کیونکہ عام لوگ دہشت کے دور میں زندگی گزار رہے ہیں، تحفظ سے محروم ہیں۔
غربت کے خاتمے اور سماجی تحفظ کی وزیر شازیہ مری نے بھی پی پی پی کے سینیٹر کی جانب سے ان کیمرہ نشست بلانے کی تجویز کی تائید کی جس میں اس اندوہناک واقعات کے پس پردہ حقائق پر تفصیلی بات چیت کی جائے اور ملک میں امن و امان پر توجہ دینے کی ضرورت پر زور دیا کیونکہ پائیدار امن سے حل میں مدد مل سکتی ہے۔ معاشی بحران سمیت دیگر تمام مسائل۔
انہوں نے یاد دلایا کہ جب بھی دہشت گردی کے واقعات جیسے کہ پشاور پولیس لائنز مسجد دھماکے اور آرمی پبلک اسکول حملے نے قوم کو ہلا کر رکھ دیا تو پارلیمنٹ ہمیشہ کلیدی کردار ادا کرنے کے لیے سامنے آئی ہے۔
وزیر نے زور دیا کہ 20 نکاتی نیشنل ایکشن پلان (این اے پی) جو کہ پارلیمنٹ کے مشترکہ اجلاس کی سفارشات پر وضع کیا گیا تھا، دہشت گردی کے واقعات کو دوبارہ ہونے سے روکنے کے لیے مکمل طور پر نافذ کیا جانا چاہیے۔
محترمہ مری نے نوٹ کیا کہ انتہا پسندی اور دہشت گردی ایک دوسرے سے جڑے ہوئے ہیں کیونکہ دونوں کے پیچھے ایک ہی بیانیہ اور ذہنیت مشترک ہے اور دونوں کے خلاف جنگ کو اس وقت تک شکست نہیں دی جا سکتی جب تک کہ ایک جوابی بیانیہ وضع نہیں کیا جاتا۔
انہوں نے یاد دلایا کہ سیاسی اختلافات کے باوجود، ان کی پارٹی نے NAP کی حمایت کی تھی کیونکہ اتحاد، ایمان اور نظم و ضبط کے اصولوں پر مبنی بیانیہ تیار کرنا ضروری تھا۔
انہوں نے کہا کہ اے پی ایس حملے اور پشاور پولیس لائنز دھماکے نے پوری قوم کو ہلا کر رکھ دیا ہے اور ایسے واقعات کو روکنے کے لیے ہمیں خود کو ٹھیک کرنا ہوگا۔ ہمیں اسکول کے بچوں اور دینی مدارس کے طلباء کو امن کو فروغ دینے کے طریقے سکھانے کے علاوہ نفرت پھیلانا بند کرنا ہوگا۔\”
قبل ازیں سینیٹر رضا ربانی نے وزیر داخلہ رانا ثناء اللہ کی عدم موجودگی پر سوال اٹھایا جب ایوان امن و امان پر بحث کے لیے مقرر تھا۔
انہوں نے کہا کہ وزیر داخلہ کا ایوان میں موجود ہونا ضروری ہے اور انہوں نے مزید کہا کہ مشترکہ اجلاس کی روایت کو برقرار رکھتے ہوئے حکومت کو دہشت گردی پر پالیسی بیان دینا چاہیے۔
\’ریاست کی گرتی ہوئی رٹ\’
اسی طرح سینیٹر مشتاق احمد نے کہا کہ خیبرپختونخوا ایک طویل عرصے سے دہشت گردی کا شکار ہے اور تاجر برادری کو بڑھتے ہوئے خطرات پر تشویش کا اظہار کیا ہے جبکہ \”صوبے میں ریاست کی رٹ کہیں نظر نہیں آتی\”۔
انہوں نے دعویٰ کیا کہ عسکریت پسندی میں اضافہ کاروباری طبقے کو صوبے سے باہر نکال رہا ہے۔
جماعت اسلامی سے تعلق رکھنے والے سینیٹر نے کہا کہ سابق وزیر اعلیٰ کے مطابق جولائی اور دسمبر 2022 کے درمیان صوبے میں 376 سے زیادہ دہشت گرد حملے ہو چکے ہیں۔
انہوں نے خدشات کا اظہار کیا کہ حکومت \”دہشت گردانہ حملوں کے سامنے بے بس\” ہے اور دہشت گردوں کے راج میں عوام اپنے لیے حفاظتی انتظامات سے محروم ہیں۔
پشاور خودکش دھماکے کے حوالے سے بات کرتے ہوئے سینیٹر نے افسوس کا اظہار کیا کہ بڑے حملے کے بعد ایک بھی شخص نے استعفیٰ نہیں دیا۔
انہوں نے کہا کہ \”دہشت گردوں کی نظریاتی بنیاد کو ختم کر دیا گیا ہے،\” انہوں نے مزید کہا کہ 2,000 علماء نے مسلح جدوجہد اور دہشت گرد حملوں کے خلاف فتویٰ جاری کیا۔
انہوں نے یہ بھی سوال کیا کہ ٹی ٹی پی سوات واپس جانے اور سی ٹی ڈی کے دفتر پر حملہ کرنے میں کیسے کامیاب ہوئی۔ ان تمام واقعات کی تحقیقات ہونی چاہئیں۔
-
Transcript of IMF Press Briefing
Transcript of IMF Press Briefing
July 14, 2022
MR. RICE: Well, good morning everyone. Welcome to this Press Briefing on
behalf of the International Monetary Fund. I’m Gerry Rice of the
Communication Department and as usual, our briefing this morning will be
embargoed until 10:30 a.m., that’s Washington time. Let me make a few quick
announcements and then turn to your questions. Great to see so many
colleagues on the screen here. And I’ve got some online as well, we’ll take
as many as we can today. So several announcements – Kristalina Georgieva,
the Managing Director is in Indonesia for the meeting of the G20 Finance
Ministers and Central Bank Governors, which is taking place there as I’m
sure you know. You will have seen her blog published yesterday as her
preview from the Fund’s perspective of the G20 agenda, so I know many of
you reported on that. And from there, she will move on to Japan, and she
will be meeting with officials and speak at the 25th Anniversary of the
IMF’s Regional Office there in Tokyo and will be posting that for you.
We’ll keep you apprised indeed of all that she’s doing on this Asia trip. I
want to remind you –- I know it’s on your calendars, that the update on our
World Economic Outlook will be on July 26th –- Tuesday, July 26 th at 9:00 o’clock and that will be with our Chief Economist,
the Fund’s Economic Counselor, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas. Pierre-Olivier
will have a press conference with you on that day, and you’ll be able to
join it via IMF.org, social media and so on. That’s July 26th -–
that’s the WEO update, okay guys. Finally, we announced earlier this week
that the annual meetings which will be from October 10th to October 16 th. I know it seems far away, but as you also know it comes up
very quickly, but we did announce earlier this week that the Annual
Meetings this year will take place in person. So, these are the first
in-person meetings since the pandemic.So look forward to seeing you all at
the annual meetings in D.C. in person. That would — really will be that’s
something very, very nice to see all of you. Okay, that’s it on the
announcements. So let me turn to your questions. I want to turn to first of
all, Olivier RO from RFI -– Radio Rogez from Radio France International
because he’s joining us for the first time. He’s having a little bit of
difficulty with his —- I can see him there but he’s having a little bit of
difficulty with his camera, and I think with his microphone. I don’t think
you can come in, Olivier in which case you’ve just sent your questions and
I’ll take them. One is on debt. And Olivier’s asking, what’s blocking
progress for the three countries that have asked for more than a year to be
part of the G20 common framework, and why a year after no decision has been
taken on the restructuring of their debt. So that’s Olivier’s question.
He’s got a second question I will come to in a moment on the resilience and
sustainability trust, and I will take your question on that too Olivier.
But I want to ask because I know it’s very much on you minds. Does anyone
else have a question on debt or on the common framework, or the three
countries that Olivier refers to which as you know are Chad, Zambia and
Ethiopia. If you have a question on that please come in. I see David.
David, come on in. Anyone else just raise your hand and we’ll take a
cluster on these questions on that. David.QUESTIONER: Hi Jerry. Thanks, good to see you after so many weeks. So,
there are a lot of meetings here. There’s finally some move here to Chad,
Ethiopia, and Zambia. Just wondering if you can give us an update on those
talks. You know, there was an earlier meeting for Chad on Wednesday. Do you
anticipate that there will be some sort of contingency arrangement based on
the price of oil? Because some of the creditors have been concerned that,
because of the high price of oil, they think Chad may no longer need a
restructuring. And if you could also comment on the other recent scandal in
Chad over embezzlement of funds from the National Oil Company, if that is a
factor in these talks. On Ethiopia, you know, there’s been some indication
that the United States has been an impediment to the deal there because of
its concerns about the ongoing civil war and so, you know, what is
realistic to expect from a creditor meeting on Monday. And then Zambia also
another meeting on Monday. Are you expecting official creditors to make
some commitments necessary to unlock IMF funding there. Thank you.MR. RICE: Thanks David. Very comprehensive –-
QUESTIONER: Lot’s to get through.
MR. RICE: Very comprehensive. Anyone else want to come in on this one? Yes,
Shabtai, hi. Good to see you Shabtai. Good to see you the other day.
Fantastic event at Devex. Congratulations.QUESTIONER: Thank you very much. David asked a lot of what I was going to
ask and more, but I’ll just add that there are some countries like Ghana
that are now coming to the IMF for different types of assistance.
Obviously, these talks are going to take some time. I was curious if the
IMF has any ability to do any fast disbursements for these countries, so
that they can get over the immediate hurdles and not face serious balance
of payment crisis. And then Secretary Yellen this morning called out China
specifically on the common framework saying, you know, they she’s not
seeing real progress. I was wondering if that’s going to be on the Managing
Director’s agenda at the G20 as well. Sort of get China to do more on debt
relief.MR. RICE: Thanks, Shabtai. Simon, welcome. Simon, not hearing you. You may
have to switch on.QUESTIONER: Okay, great.
MR. RICE: Gotha, yep.
QUESTIONER: Good. So, thank you for taking my question. This is Simon Ateba
at Today News Africa and Washington. On Ethiopia, I just wanted to know how
you approach the situation. Do you need to wait until the civil war is over
or do you –- I just want to understand, to, you know, how you approach it
and then I have other questions. I don’t know if I can ask them now or wait
for you to come back.MR. RICE: Okay Simon. Anyone else on this clutch of issues in countries.
Otherwise, I can give you what I’ve got. Good. So, broadly to begin with on
debt again, I want to refer to what Kristalina Georgieva has been saying in
recent days including this Devex event where we were with Shabtai. And
including in the blog yesterday. If you haven’t seen it, what she’s been
saying on debt really warning of the serious potential challenges facing
the world on the debt front. But she said in the blog we need decisive
actions now and she said time is not on our side, and she was urging large
lenders, both sovereign and private to step up and play their part. So, you
know, I think that was kind of a response to some of the issues that you’ve
been raising. More specifically, again we’ve been saying that a third of
emerging markets and developing economies are in debt distress, and for
low-income countries it’s worse than that. It’s actually nearly twice as
high, it’s 60 percent. So, the risk of debt crisis is increasing again as
the Managing Director has been warning and urgency is the word. No time for
complacency. And she will certainly be bringing that message to the G20 as
it meets over these next couple of days. So, what can I tell you on the
three specific countries that David and others mentioned. Let me just -–
I’ll tell you what I have, and you can follow-up though I don’t really have
much more on the specifics of the countries. But the three creditor
committees for Chad, for Zambia and Ethiopia are all set to meet in the
coming days, this month. And I think Kristalina Georgieva was the first one
to indicate that that was happening and that is happening. So let me just
go through them quickly. On Chad, again as Olivier said it was one of the
first countries to request a debt treatment. I can say that progress has
been made in our discussions with Chad on the overall macroeconomic
framework and reforms that could underly the first review of the program,
the extended credit facility that we have with Chad but that’s staff level
agreement, which as you know is a crucial first step, remains conditioned
on sufficient financing assurances as is the case with all our programs,
and that includes an agreement on the necessary debt treatment.Again, consistent with Fund Program parameters, we need financing
assurances, and we need assurance on debt sustainability. So, the Creditor
Committee on Chad, we expect to continue to meet. We think it’s essential.
Again, that an agreement be reached promptly with all creditors, including
Glenn Core to allow us to submit this first review under the ongoing
arrangement that we have with Chad, and we’d then be able to put that to
our Executive Board as soon as we possibly can, and try and provide the
necessary financial support that Chad needs in this time of crisis. So,
again, those of you who follow the Fund, you understand what I’m saying
here. The staff-level agreement followed by approval of our Board is
standard procedure. So, that’s on Chad.On Zambia, a second meeting of Zambia’s Creditor Committee we expect to
take place in the next week or so, and if official creditors can succeed in
providing the financing assurances, again, to Zambia within the next few
weeks, we can then take that to our Board for consideration of a program;
and, you know, that could happen very soon after our Board recess, which is
the first couple of weeks in August. So, we would be looking at probably
around early September for that. Again, provided these steps are taken.
That’s on Zambia.On Ethiopia: well, we welcome that the Creditor Committee has been formed
for Ethiopia, again, under this G20 common framework, and we have been and
will continue to work closely to provide the needed technical support to
the work of that Creditor Committee for Ethiopia and, specifically, we will
meet with the Creditor Committee for Ethiopia the week of July 18th to
update them what we see as the economic situation in Ethiopia. I know a
number of you were asking about the political circumstances, and so on in
Ethiopia. I don’t have anything on that, but we will be updating on the
economic situation for Ethiopia with the Creditor Committee for that
country the week of July 18.That’s all I have on the three countries. You can follow up, but I can tell
now, I really don’t have much more than that, but you’re welcome to follow
up.Shabtai asked about Ghana, in addition to those three countries. Shabtai,
you may have seen the statement we issued last night on Ghana. I see that
you did; good. So, I’m not going to repeat. It’s a fairly comprehensive
statement. I’m not going to repeat all that’s in there, Shabtai; but,
essentially, for those of you who haven’t seen it, we had been in
discussions with Ghana. They have requested an IMF program to support their
homegrown economic program. We did have an IMF staff mission in Accra from
July 6 through yesterday, the 13th; and then, as we pretty much always do,
we issued an end-of-mission statement. So, we’re at an early stage with
Ghana in the discussions for a program, and those discussions will
continue. I refer you to the ‑‑ I can say more but I’d really just be
repeating what’s in a very comprehensive statement on Ghana, and it’s right
there on the website.Shabtai added to his question. Well, can the IMF do more, and can you do
something faster? So, you know, just a reminder that in this crisis over
the last couple of years, we have moved faster in an unprecedented way for
the IMF in terms of speed with our emergency financing, with our direct
debt relief and, of course, there was the SDR allocation less than a year
ago.So, you know, we’re doing as much as we can, looking to do as much as we
can, Shabtai, and I’m sure you’re watching almost, you know, on a
week-by-week, and sometimes day-by-day basis. There’s plenty of action,
plenty of support going to countries from the IMF just in recent days.
Moldova, the $171 million to Senegal, the $456 million to Mozambique, the
$638 million recently to Benin. And, of course, emergency financing through
our facilities can still be provided when members face urgent balance of
payment problems and, what we call, and upper-traded trench regular program
is either not feasible or not necessary. But just to say, this is not a
static situation, we’re really moving every day, and I’ve just given a few
examples there of the types of support we’ve been providing.We’ve taken a bit of time on this. It’s an important, it’s a crucial issue.
I’m sure it will feature; it will loom large at the G20.Does anyone want to come back on that common framework? If not, I’ll leave
it there and let me just take Olivier’s other question. I’ll try and take
it quickly and then I’ll come to Argentina because I see a number of
colleagues raising their hands.But, again, Olivia’s asking on the RST, how does it work? What’s the
timeline? Where are you on funding, et. cetera. So, again, Olivier, there’s
actually a lot of information on our website on the RST. There’s a really
good Q&A and you can find a lot of the stuff there. But, you are
correct. This is a very important, we think, new instrument for the IMF.
We’ve never had anything like this before, focused on the macro-critical
challenges facing countries, but the longer-term structural challenges with
macroeconomic implications, we have not had that kind of instrument.
Before, the IMF, as you know, normally, does short-term financing. So, this
is new and it’s focused on resilience, sustainability issues. Most notably,
climate change, pandemic preparedness, but other issues too. It covers a
wide range of countries, certainly low and vulnerable low-income countries,
but also vulnerable middle-income countries and fragile states undertaking
structural reforms. It covers, we estimate, about three-quarters of our
membership. That’s three-quarters of 190.As I said, long-term financing, this is new. Twenty-year maturity,
10-1/2-year grace period, and low interest rates, and eligibility is high
quality policy measures, a concurrent financing or non-financing
arrangement with the IMF, sustainable debt ‑‑ I mentioned that earlier.
That’s true of all of our programs. And, you know, capacity to repay the
fund. All of that, again, standard stuff for our other programs.We aim for the RST to leverage additional financing, not just IMF financing
from official and non-official sources. Where do we stand on funding? Our
initial aspiration is to get to $45 billion. We stand at close to $40. We
are at $37 billion, about $37 billion right now, and we’re hoping to get to
the $45 really soon. And, when will it all kick in? We aim to start RST
lending by around the time of our annual meetings in the Fall. So, it’s not
far away. It’s coming up in the early part of October. Again, depending on
securing the sufficient funding, but the bottom line is very good progress
on the RST, on this new instrument. Thanks for the question.Colleagues from Argentina. I see Liliana. I see Raphael. Liliana. And I see
Juan Manuel. Hi, guys. Come on in. Liliana, you first.QUESTIONER: Okay, thank you. Thank you, Gerry. While we have a new Minister
of Economies, Silvina Batakis, and my question is did the Minister,
Batakis, discuss with the IMF staff to change the goals agreed in the
program. I’m referring as an example, for instance, the fiscal goal to
reduce the fiscal deficit to 2.5. Are conversations going ahead in this
point? Thank you, Gerry.MR. RICE: Thank you, Lilliana. Raphael or Juan Manuel, do you want to add?
QUESTIONER: Yes, thanks, Gerry. Two questions. MD Georgieva said in an
interview with Reuters that some painful actions might be needed. I was
hoping you could clarify what exactly did she mean by painful actions. And
a second question. Does the IMF still categorize Argentina’s program as
credible and realistic? Are you sticking with that characterization of the
program? Thanks.MR. RICE: Hey, thanks, Raphael. Nice to see you. Juan Manuel, come on in.
QUESTIONER: Hi, Gerry, and everyone. Well, the first question. What can we
know about the second quarterly review of Argentina’s program; and,
secondly, similar to what Raphael asked, the new minister of the economy
announced this week a plan, a fiscal plan. So, my question is: are these
measures match with the need of painful actions mentioned by the Managing
Director, Kristalina Georgieva?MR. RICE: Thanks, Juan Manuel. I\’m seeing Patricia. Hi, Patricia. Come on
in.QUESTIONER: Hi, Gerry. Also, in tune with my colleagues, I would like to
ask if there is a meeting coming up, agreed to meet the new members of the
Argentine economic team? And when can we expect the next review?MR. RICE: Good. Thanks, Patricia. Rodrigo, are you looking to come in on
Argentina? I see your hand raised. Is this on Argentina or something else?QUESTIONER: Thank you, Gerry. Anything I had on Argentina my colleagues
asked. I want to ask about Ukraine. So, you can come back to me later.MR. RICE: All right. I\’ll come back to you then, Rodrigo, yes. So, thanks,
guys, for that clutch of questions on Argentina. Let me give you what I
have.So, last week, just within the past week, our Managing Director, Kristalina
Georgieva, and our Director for the Western Hemisphere Department, whom you
all know, Ilan Goldfajn, they each had calls with Minister Batakis. And the
Managing Director issued a short statement after her call. She
characterized it as a very good call with the Minister where they discussed
the implementation of the ongoing program, Argentina\’s program, supported
by the IMF. And the way she put it was we\’re looking forward to continuing
our constructive engagement to promote economic stability and inclusive
growth in Argentina in this very challenging global environment that
Argentina and pretty much every country is facing right now.I can add to that, again, responding to some of your questions. I hope that
our staff, team on Argentina, including our resident representative in
Buenos Aires are already engaging with the Minister and her technical team.
As you know, and as some of you mentioned, the Minister recently and
publicly reiterated her commitment to implement the Fund supported program
and the agreed program objectives.And the announced measures referred to by the Minister are consistent with
the objectives of the program that had been agreed to strengthen
macroeconomic stability and begin tackling Argentina\’s deep seated
challenges, specifically in what the Minister said, we welcome efforts to
strengthen expenditure controls, tax compliance, and public debt management
coordination. So, we continue to engage with the Minister and her team as
they work to implement their economic program that\’s supported by the Fund.Someone asked, maybe it was Juan Manuel, about the second review and that\’s
expected to take place in September. And we will communicate about that in
due course.So, the bottom line I think is, you know, questions were asked about where
is the program? Are the objectives still the same? Is it realistic, and so
on? To which, you know, I would just refer to what I\’ve just said and what
the Minister has said, that the objectives remain. And I would, again,
repeat that we have had a very positive initial engagement with the
Minister. And we look forward to continuing to work constructively to
achieve the agreed objectives. And that\’s where the focus of the
discussions is, and those discussions are ongoing.Martin, you didn\’t get a chance. Come on in. Martin. Martin, did you want
to come in on Argentina? Martin Canasberger (phonetic), can you hear me? I
thought I saw your hand raised, Martin. You\’re having trouble so, okay.
We\’ll come back to Martin.I\’m going to turn to Maoling I think has a question on China. Martin, I\’ll
come back to you. I see your. Maoling?QUESTIONER: Hi. Thank you, Gerry, very much for taking my question. I want
to ask about the Chinese economy because it has been hurt badly by the
lockdowns related to COVID-19. I was wondering whether the IMF has some
suggestions for Chinese policy makers in terms of how to handle the economy
under the current circumstances.MR. RICE: Thank you, Maoling. I heard you loud and clear. I also heard an
echo of myself. I hope everything — I hope you\’re able to hear things
clearly, everybody. If you have a problem, let me know. And Martin, I\’ll
try and come back to you.On Maoling\’s question about China, and she was asking about the economic
impact of the lockdowns and IMF\’s ongoing advice on the economy. So,
clearly, a key issue in the short term, given the large impact the recent
lockdowns had on economic activity in China, is for macroeconomic policy to
step up and meet the challenge of the slowing growth momentum that we are
seeing in China. And in that context, we welcome the shift to a more
expansionary fiscal policy this year.But even more support would help counter the ongoing growth slowdown. This
fiscal support would be particularly effective, in our view, if focused on
vulnerable households through transfers and strengthening of the social
protection system. In addition, given low core inflation and a still
negative output gap, our view is that the Peoples Bank of China should
continue to provide monetary support. The reduction in key policy rates
earlier this year helps lower borrowing costs, strengthens investment. It\’s
a welcome step towards interest rate based accommodative policy.But, — and coming a bit more directly to your question, Maoling — but the
lockdowns also emphasize the importance of continuing to adjust China\’s
zero-COVID strategy. In particular, mitigating the disruption to economic
activity from COVID would require ramping up booster shots and targeting
the under-vaccinated elderly. This should eventually allow adjusting the
containment strategy to become more flexible and less restrictive. That\’s
what I have for you, Maoling, on China.I am seeing Heather Scott asking about — Heather\’s got a couple of things.
But Heather\’s asking about Sri Lanka. Heather Scott, AFP. What are the
prospects for aid for Sri Lanka given the political upheaval? Is the Fund
considering any emergency bridge financing to help deal with the immediate
crisis? Sri Lanka, much in the news. Let me ask if anyone else has a
question on Sri Lanka and I\’ll try and take a clutch of them. Matthew, hi.QUESTIONER: Yeah, sure. Thanks a lot. I\’ve been wanting to ask this. I
mean, given the turmoil in the country and President — or not-President
Gotabaya Rajapaksa now reportedly being in Singapore, I guess I wondered if
you could specifically, what\’s the relationship? Does this have to shake
itself out, including the Prime Minister\’s role, before the IMF can do
anything? What is — I know you often say you won\’t speak to political
things, but this is kind of an extraordinary situation in which, you know,
people are swimming in the presidential swimming pool. They held a mock IMF
session in the presidential palace.What is the sort of minimum of political stability that the IMF would see?
Who are they talking to, I guess? That\’s my question on Sri Lanka.MR. RICE: Right. Good question. Anyone else coming in on Sri Lanka or wants
to? Okay. Then I will take the couple of questions we have from Heather and
from Matthew.So, like everyone else we are, of course, deeply concerned about the
ongoing crisis, it\’s impact on the Sri Lankan people, and particularly the
poor and the vulnerable groups in Sri Lanka. Again, like everyone else,
we\’re closely monitoring the political and the social developments there.We hope for a resolution of the current situation that would allow for our
resumption of a dialogue on an IMF supported program. You may recall that
in June, less than a month ago, things are moving so fast, but less than a
month ago there was an IMF staff team in Colombo. And we did have
discussions, actually, constructive discussions with the authorities on a
set of economic policies and reforms that could be supported by,
potentially by an IMF program. We don\’t have a program with Sri Lanka right
now. But we were discussing what could be a program.Clearly, the political and the social emergency situation I guess we could
characterize it and we all see what\’s happening, you described it, Matthew,
has, you know, interrupted those discussions and we hope to resume as soon
as possible. In the meantime, you asked, you know, who we\’re talking to,
Matthew. We do have technical counterparts still in, you know, some of the
key ministries in the central bank and the Ministry of Finance. So, we are
able to continue discussions there.But the, you know, the high-level discussions with the authorities that we
would need to begin discussions on a program, we hope again, that these
would be able to resume as soon as possible. So, you know, looking to do
all we can in just an extraordinary difficult situation.Heather, I don’t have anything about emergency or bridge financing. You
know, as I just described, we were having these discussions with Sri Lanka.
And we hope to resume them as soon as the situation has stabilized a bit.
And, of course, an important part of those discussions is the debt
situation. Sri Lanka\’s public debt is assessed as unsustainable and as is
the case with every IMF program, not just the case of Sri Lanka, for
approval by the Board. And we are not at that stage, but for approval by
the Board, a program would require adequate assurances on debt
sustainability. So, that\’s what I have on this, you know, situation that\’s
of great concern in Sri Lanka.Heather had a question on Pakistan. I\’m going to come back online in a
minute. If you have a question, please raise your hand, raise your virtual
hand. Heather\’s question on Pakistan. What\’s the status of talks? So,
Heather, much like the case of Ghana, we issued a statement within the last
24 hours on Pakistan. I want to refer you to that. It was that we have
reached — the substance of it was we\’ve reached a staff level agreement
with Pakistan, you know, it\’s been much in the news. And it\’s an agreement
on a combined seventh and eighth review of the program that we do have with
Pakistan that will translate into about 1.17 million being disbursed to
Pakistan. Pretty much, straight away, and a reminder that this brings total
disbursements from the IMF to Pakistan under the ongoing program to well
over $4 billion, about $4.2 billion. And we\’re hoping this will help to
stabilize the economy and amongst other things help expand the social
safety net to protect the most vulnerable; accelerate structural reforms;
and stabilize the macroeconomic, help stabilize the macroeconomic situation
in Pakistan. That\’s what I have. The statement is quite substantive.Heather, do you want to come in on, on Pakistan, follow up. I see your hand
raised Heather, but I do not hear you. There you are, Heather.QUESTIONER: Now, Gerry.
MR. RICE: There you are. Nice. Now, I see you as well, which is terrific.
Hi.QUESTIONER: Okay. Sorry about that. Yeah, that question was a little out of
date. I gave it before the statement was issued, but I did want to follow
up. Do we have any sense of timing on the Board meeting for that agreement?MR. RICE: Heather, I don\’t have anything beyond what the statement says.
But look, as you know, the Board meeting can follow — you who follow the
Fund, and I know you do, Heather can follow any time between three, six
weeks, within that period could be slightly earlier, could be slightly
later, could fall within that, but that\’s roughly the ballpark between the
staff level agreement and then the final agreement, which comes from our
Board.Okay. I\’m going to move off Pakistan. I\’m going to — Martin, I see your
question on Argentina.QUESTIONER: Great.
MR. RICE: You\’re asking about hyperinflation. Do you share the same fear?
What do you think about the financial crisis? The huge difference, official
alternative exchange rates. Martin, I really don\’t have much to add beyond
what I said to other colleagues on Argentina. So, I want to acknowledge
your question. These are important issues. They will be subjects of the
ongoing discussions I\’m sure, but I don\’t have any specific detail on that.So, let me come back in the room and I see — Rodrigo, I don\’t think we
took a question from you. David, I see you I\’ll come to you. Simon, I see
you. I\’ll come to you. Rodrigo.QUESTIONER: Thank you, Gerry. I wanted to ask about Ukraine and where are
you advising them in terms of payment of foreign debt? And is the advice
different for the sovereign and for the SOE or is it the same?MR. RICE: Okay. Anyone else coming in on Ukraine? Okay. So, maybe just,
stepping back on Ukraine, Rodrigo. We\’ve been supporting them with a
program loan of 1.4 billion. We\’ve supported them from the SDR, their SDR
allocation. We\’ve established the administered account, what we call
administered account from donors to support Ukraine. Canada, Germany, the
Netherlands have all stepped in so far. We\’re expecting more in the coming
days. We attended the Ukraine Recovery Conference, which focused more on
the reconstruction. At the moment, Ukraine is servicing its debt in an
orderly way. And we would expect that to continue. So, just to respond to
your question, what we\’re also saying is that what we see as the priority
in terms of financing for Ukraine right now is grant financing in the
immediate and the short-term. That\’s the best form of assistance that can
be provided by the international community, in light of the war situation
and the nature of the shock. And that would allow the Ukrainian Government
to remain operational without incurring further debt, which is an important
dimension of the question you asked.QUESTIONER: Sorry. So, there\’s no recommendation on requesting payment
freezes or anything like that?MR. RICE: No, I don\’t have anything beyond Rodrigo of what I just said.
Okay?QUESTIONER: Thank you, Gerry.
MR. RICE: Thank you. David, did you want to come in on something else or
are you okay, David Lawder?QUESTIONER: No, Gerry I\’m okay. We\’ve got a lot to get through here before
10:30. Thanks.MR. RICE: You do. Thank you, David. Appreciate it. Simon?
QUESTIONER: Thank you, Gerry, for this question again. I would like to ask
you two question. One on Angola, if you can access the state of the Angolan
economy. I noticed recently you had a projection growth of about 3 percent,
and on the upcoming IMF, World Bank Annual Meetings. I don\’t know if you
can tell us more how many delegates do you expect? Is there any change? Do
you anticipate any change from 2019 when it was last done in-person? Thank
you.MR. RICE: Thanks Simon. Simon, I\’ll need to come back to you on Angola, and
we will come back to you immediately after the press briefing. Okay. I\’m
not up to date myself on Angola, but it\’s a good question and we will come
back to you after the press briefing.On the Annual Meetings. Simon, again, they’re going to be in-person for the
first time since the pandemic. And we are certainly hoping that as many of
our member countries will be represented in-person as is possible. We\’re
all monitoring the situation with COVID. We see how it\’s dynamic to say the
least, but we have a plan, and we have an objective and an aspiration. And
that aspiration is that we will see our member countries to the greatest
extent possible in-person in Washington, in October. That\’s what I have on
that.Anyone else looking to come in, because, if not, then I\’ll take the last
question, which is from David Herblings on Bloomberg. And David\’s asking
about Kenya. What\’s the status on additional funding? Are they considering
a waiver of conditions such as Kenya requested, including established a
government’s central payroll inflation target? It\’s a pretty detailed
question, David. I can really only answer pretty broadly on Kenya, which is
that we are scheduled, our Board, is scheduled to discuss Kenya\’s third
review under the IMF program arrangements on July 18th. So, that\’s Monday,
and we will be able to give you more detail on what you\’re asking after
that meeting. We have commended the Kenyan authorities\’ strong program
commitment. Actions to, in response to external challenges. And the
program, as I say, supports those objectives, including to put debt on a
downward trajectory and demobilizing taxes, spending wisely will create
space to meet social and development needs. The program includes specific
actions to promote transparency, reduce the risk of corruption, and so on.
So, I guess my message is David sit tight. The Board is meeting on Monday,
and we will have more thereafter, including publication of the full report
that the Board looks at on Monday. As always, we will publish that and I\’m
sure a lot of the details that you\’re asking about will be in that report.So, with that we have hit the 10:30 hour almost. I want to thank you for
joining us today. We will not have another press conference before the
Board recess that I mentioned, first two weeks of August, but there will be
a full-fledged press conference from the IMF on July 26th on the WEO update
led by Pierre Olivier Gourinchas. I know many of you will be, looking
forward to that. Stay safe and well everyone, and look forward to seeing
you all soon. Bye-bye.* * * * *
IMF Communications Department
MEDIA RELATIONS
PRESS OFFICER: Nicolas Mombrial
Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org
-
Transcript of the October 2022 Middle East and Central Asia Department Press Briefing
Transcript of October 2022 Middle East and Central Asia Department Press Briefing
October 13, 2022
Speakers:
JIHAD AZOUR,
Director of Middle East and Central Asia Department, IMFWAFA AMR,
Senior Communications Officer, IMFMS. AMR:
Good morning. Thank you all for joining us for the press briefing on the
Middle East and Central Asia Regional Economic Outlook. I’m Wafa Amr, from
the Communications Department. It’s really very nice to see you here in
person again. We have with us Jihad Azour, Director of the Middle East and
Central Asia Department, and he will start with opening remarks. We do have
interpretation into Arabic. Thank you, Jihad, please go ahead.MR. AZOUR:
Thank you very much, Wafa. Also, good morning and welcome to the 2022 IMF
Annual Meetings. We are glad to have you back here. It’s always a pleasure
to have this in-person meetings. Before answering your questions, I would
like to make a few remarks about the economic outlook for both the Middle
East and Central Asia region, and I will start with MENA, and then Central
Asia.The region is being hit by a confluence of shocks. Global slowdowns still
high in volatile food and energy prices, and faster and stronger tightening
of global financial conditions. Nonetheless, economic activity in the
region has been resilient thus far, with multispeed recovery continuing in
2022; and we project that the region will grow at 5 percent this year, up
from 4.1 percent in 2021. However, the worsening of global conditions will
weigh on the outlook for next year with growth slowing to 3.6 percent.
Growth is projected at 5.2 percent this year for the oil exporters, with
high oil prices and robust non-oil GDP growth of setting the global
headwinds. However, economic activity in these countries is expected or so
to slow next year as OPEC-plus production cuts, and oil price decline, and
global demand is expected to slow.In contrast, the region’s emerging market and middle-income economies are
facing a deep term-of-trade shock, weakening of global demand, and tighter
financial conditions, which could translate into higher government service
debt and worsening of debt dynamics. The real GDP is foreseen to grow at
4.9 percent this year, up from 3.6 percent last year, with an acceleration
mainly driven by Egypt’s performance during the fiscal year 2022 before
slowing to 3.9 percent in 2023.Meanwhile, low-income countries are struggling with high commodity prices,
limited progress in vaccination rollouts, and country-specific fragilities.
Accordingly, growth in low-income countries will remain weak at just 0.8
percent this year.Inflation continued to increase and has become now broad-based. Headline
inflation in MENA is projected at 14.2 percent, on average, for this year,
and expected to remain elevated in 2023.Now, let me turn to the outlook for Caucasus and Central Asia. The adverse
impact of the war in Ukraine on the Caucasus and Central Asia economies has
been milder so far. Relative to the latest forecast in April, the CCA
growth for 2022 has been revised up by 1.2 percentage points to 3.8 percent
this year. Robust growth in the first half reflects a smaller than expected
contraction in Russia, robust foreign exchange inflows, as well as
resilient trade.Still, uncertainty remains very high. CCA countries are exposed to
spillover from the war through trade, tourism, remittances, and financial
channels, with economic activity likely to be increasingly affected as
sanctions remain in place for an extended period. The full growth is
projected to slow to 3.5 percent over the medium term, which is
significantly below the region’s historical average of almost 7 percent.Headline inflation, which has accelerated despite recent monetary policy
tightening, is projected to remain in double digits at 12.9 percent this
year, and 10.5 percent in 2023.I would like to say a few words about the risks to our outlook, and there
are many. As I have mentioned, and as you will hear throughout the Annual
Meetings, global growth has slowed, and risks are extraordinarily high. Let
me highlight some of the key risks that are relevant to the outlook of the
region. One, persistently high commodity prices and pervasive food
shortages remain a top concern. Amid low strategic food reserves, rising
fertilizer costs could present risks to 2023 agricultural harvest, reducing
food security and potentially raising social tensions.Another concern is the potential for tighter than expected financial
conditions that could tip the balance toward financial instability and debt
distress in certain cases.Three, broadening inflation is also a concern, as it may require deeper
disinflationary policies, which have the potential to be more costly than
expected. And the question now is what countries across both MENA and CCA
need to prioritize.First, countries should seek to restore price stability while, at the same
time, protecting vulnerables, preserving fiscal sustainability while
maintaining social stability, and also ensure food and energy security, and
manage lingering pandemic-related risks.Two, the worsening of global environment, as well as also the tightening of
macroeconomic policies, and the limited policy space in several countries
raise the urgency of pressing ahead with structural reforms to bolster
economic growth while transforming economies to become more resilient,
sustainable, and diversified, as well as also becoming more inclusive.We’ll explore the outlook, the risks, and policy priorities of both regions
in greater depth when we launch our Regional Economic Outlook in Dubai
later this month and then in Uzbekistan, in some account, in early
November. At those events, we will also discuss the two analytical chapters
for this REO that are dedicated to the fiscal implication of surging
commodity prices in the case of MENA countries, and the distributional
impact of Russia’s war in Ukraine on the CCA.Before opening the floor to questions, I would like to underscore the IMF
continued commitment to supporting countries throughout the region, and
this through policy advice, technical assistance, where we are scaling up
our support both for MENA and CCA with a new center in Kazakhstan, and in
many cases, financial support. Since the outbreak of the COVID crisis, the
IMF has supported both MENA and CCA, plus Afghanistan and Pakistan with
US$21.3 billion in financing. And, in addition, in 2021, we provided,
through the SDR allocation, additional boost to reserves by US$49 billion.Again, thank you very much for joining us here in Washington, and also for
those who are online, I would like to welcome you, and I would be happy to
take your questions.MS. AMR:
Thank you, Jihad. For journalists online, please send your questions to the
press center. We’ll start here with you. Yes, please, go ahead.QUESTIONER:
Hello. Thank you, Mr. Jihad. Thank you, Ms. Wafa. I — my name is Ahmad
Yacoub. I am the Managing Editor of Al-Ahram — Egyptian Newspaper. My
question is about the Egyptian affairs and the cooperation between Egypt
and the International Monetary Fund. I would like to ask about the latest
developments of the negotiations between Egypt and the IMF, concerning the
loan, and total size of the loan, and the economic prospects about Egypt,
in terms of growth rate in the current fiscal year and the upcoming fiscal
year, and the inflation rate, how we can deal with the inflation rate right
now, and a time of approval of the new loan for Egypt. Thank you.MS. AMR:
Thank you. We do have several journalists wanting to ask about Egypt. So,
shall we take all the questions, first, on Egypt?MR. AZOUR:
Yes, please.QUESTIONER:
I will ask in Arabic. I am an anchor in the Egyptian television. I will
speak about something different from what my colleague has said. Some of
the issues that have been raised, there are very tight conditions to
provide the loan to Egypt and to other countries, in general. Is it
possible to consider that the current conditions, which are very
exceptional, and that the developing countries suffering from — in light
of the Coronavirus and the war, does this require to lessen the conditions
from the Fund, which would lead to increasing the price of the foreign
currency, vis-à-vis the local currency? So, this will lead to increasing
the burden on the vulnerable and the poor. So, some other issues that are
required by the Fund, we may find issues in the countries. So, the
governments try to get rid of some of their — or sell part of their share
in the companies to the private sector. This is good, maybe, in terms of
economy, but at the social level, it may lead to some problems. Thank you.MS. AMR:
Please. There’s a microphone here.QUESTIONER:
Yeah, thank you. Julian, The Africa Report. And I’m sorry if this is the
question that he asked about. Just following up on Egypt, President Sisi
had asked that you lift the applicable standards. It wasn’t clear what he
was talking about. Is it subsidies? Is it, you know, the military’s
involvement in the economy for this new IMF loan? So, if you could talk a
little bit about that and, you know, what kind of standards you will be
holding Egypt to, to get such a loan. Appreciate it. Thank you.MS. AMR:
Thank you very much. I also want to recognize a question I got online from
Reuters, Lewis, Aidan Lewis. And his question is, are you satisfied that
Egypt will be able to come up with additional funding to complete the
expected EFF Program? So, if there are no more questions on Egypt, Jihad,
please.MR. AZOUR:
Thank you very much. I will split my question into maybe English and
Arabic. First of all, the cooperation between the IMF and Egypt is very
strong. Since 2016, the Fund has provided, at two instances, support to
Egypt, in order to address economic, social, and financial challenges. Back
in the first program, we have been able, with a reform agenda that was set
by the Egyptian Authorities to help in bringing financial stability,
strengthening the reserves of the Central Bank, restoring growth, and
improving economic and social conditions. Part of the original program was
an important social pillar that had an objective in order to shield and
protect the low-income people and provide, especially for those in the
rural area, with direct and targeted support.We also took into consideration the importance of strengthening the
competitive capacity of Egypt, through structure reform. Egypt is a country
that has a huge potential and a very active private sector, and therefore,
the purpose of those reforms were to accelerate growth, in order to create
jobs. During the COVID crisis, the Fund has been very responsive in
providing Egypt with two tranches of support, with a total amount of $8.8
billion, in order to help Egypt address the impact of the COVID shock and
allow the country to be better prepared to protect lives and livelihoods.And our support to Egypt, in terms of technical assistance, in terms of
policy support, has been continuous, over all this period. Recently, Egypt,
like other emerging markets, was hit by a certain number of external shocks
that have increased the level of vulnerabilities in many emerging
economies. And the country has been faced with a certain number of food
security issues because of the impact of the war in Ukraine, as well as
also some impact on remittances and to — mainly, sorry, revenues from
tourism.Of course, as very strong partners, we have started, based on the request
from the Egyptian Authority, to explore an opportunity to provide
assistance to Egypt, in terms of a new program. This program has a certain
number of key pillars. One is to protect Egypt from exogenous shocks, that
there are many. And this is where the importance of adapting the monetary
policy, to shield the economy from those external shocks. Maintain a fiscal
discipline that is very much needed, while strengthening the social
protection mechanisms, through the various instruments, Takaful and Karama
and other type of instruments that have helped provide the protection for
the low-income people.Of course, addressing the issue of inflation, as you see, it’s a global
priority. And when inflation reaches double digit, it becomes an issue, not
only for the monetary stability, but for the overall stability. But also, I
think the role of the private sector in Egypt has proved to be very
effective, both in terms of the competencies in the private sector and the
ability to drive growth in the economy, over the medium term. And this is
why there is also a certain number of important reforms, on the structural
side, that will allow Egypt to maintain a high level of growth and address
some of the issues that were brought in by the current exogenous shock and
crisis.This is where we stand, okay? The negotiation have started, they’re
progressing, and we will, as soon as we reach staff level agreement, we
will inform you about the size and the content of this agreement.MS. AMR:
Okay. Yes, please, go ahead here, in the front.QUESTIONER:
Hi. Thank you. Cameo Shaquoia, from The Africa Bazaar. I have a question
regarding Tunisia. As you know, the Central Bank of Tunisia recently
increased bank fees and interest rates, hindering access to consumer loan.
I was wondering if you could provide any updates on what the IMF is doing.
And are you working with the Central Bank of Tunisia? And also, if you can
provide updates on Sudan and Somalia also.MS. AMR:
Thank you very much. We also have a question on Tunisia, online, from Angus
MacDougall, Reuters. When do you expect to sign a staff level agreement
with Tunisia? Can you outline what you expect from it?MR. AZOUR:
Thank you very much. I need to answer the question, also, in Arabic. Well,
we already had several rounds of discussion with the Tunisian Authorities,
in the context of providing support through a new program. In the last two
years, we provided one and a half billion dollars to Tunisia, 750
immediately after the COVID shock, and another one of similar amount, last
year, with the SDR allocations.Of course, Tunisia is a country that has been hit by the confluence of
shocks, and the recovery in 2021 and 2022 allowed Tunisia to recover,
partially, some of the impact of the first wave of shock, which came with
COVID. A certain number of important reforms were already planned by the
government and the government team, which are encouraging steps, in order
to allow Tunisia to address their fiscal imbalances, as well as, also, to
arrest the risk of inflation and improve economic conditions. This was
complimented by an active social dialogue that has had the various partners
to work together. We are also currently in negotiation with the Tunisian
Authorities, and the negotiations are progressing. And then, again, as soon
as an agreement is reached, we will inform you more about the detail. When
it comes to the central bank actions, as you know, the priority, today, is
to reduce the risk of inflation. And reducing this rate of inflation would
require to use certain number of measures, on the interest rate side, as
well as, also, on the provision of liquidity. And therefore, those are part
of the instruments that the central bank usually — or could resort to, in
order to address inflation.The question in Arabic is about the conditions, in fact, as it was in the
past, currently. The program takes into consideration the social conditions
and insists on having that the most vulnerable and marginalized segments
are protected from any conditions or from any measures to be taken. There
is a necessity in Egypt and in other countries to enhance the social
protection system, in order to correct the path of subsidy, which is less
effective because it’s the less targeted or not targeted.It has to be more targeted, more targeted to the segments and the groups
that are more vulnerable to face the adverse impact of the increase of
prices and inflation. Increase of prices and inflation impacts the
vulnerable and those who have limited sources of income. Therefore, we also
emphasize the importance of expanding the network of social protection and
using the limited resources available, at the local level, which are under
more pressures, due to having more crisis. It needs to be reformed.Therefore, the objective in the — of the program is, first of all, to
maintain stability because there is no welfare without stability, no
welfare without stability. We need to confirm and to emphasize in the light
of the economic developments all over the world. We need to go — or
emphasize the importance of stability on the monetary side, on the
financial side, and with regards to inflation. These are the main
priorities to enable the investor to increase the level of the investment
and the citizen to be able to have purchasing power and to maintain it. And
it — no doubt, the world is changing, and the world is changing, and these
need — this would need adaptation from every one of us.Therefore, we need reforms to increase the capacity to attract investments.
In the past, the region has attracted the flow of capitals in the form of
portfolio investments. So, the challenge in the future would be to attract
investments that are dyad investment that would create jobs. These
investments, led by the private sector, and would require a number of
environments that would incubate and flourish these investments. Therefore,
the role of the private sector is very important. It’s fundamental and
vital. And the country — the state has to be supporting and not competing
with it. Therefore, we have to give space to the private sector to work and
grow.MS. AMR:
We have a question on Qatar. And the question is in Arabic. What are the
economic prospects for Qatar, in the coming two years after the World Cup
ends? And what are the inflation rates, currently?MR. AZOUR:
Qatar has managed, in the past two years, to face the COVID crisis and
accelerate economic development, and there were investments that were
benefited from, in order to build and prepare for the World Cup. This has
contributed to improving the economic activity for the non-oil sector and
also improving recently in the oil and gas prices have also helped
accelerating the economic flourishing.In the next year, we expect that to continue, we expect that that trend
will keep. There will be improvement in growth. Also, this is due to the
investments that are made by Qatar currently in order to enhance its
ability to produce gas and to export it. So, we expect it to be the largest
country exporting liquified gas, [LNG].In addition to all that, there was a number of measures that were taken to
maintain the stability at the fiscal level and to enhance the ability of
Qatar to increase the level of resource. With regards to prices overall,
the GCC countries, because maybe due to it has a low share of food staff
and commodities in their consumption. It was not impacted at the same level
as other countries did from the increase of prices at the global level.In addition to that, there was some kind of continuity of subsidizing some
commodities and some also measures to lessen and reduce the increase in
prices. Therefore, the levels of inflation have remained less than they are
globally in this region. So, we have to be cautious because there is an
increase in inflation currently at the level of the world and in the
region. On Somalia and Sudan.QUESTIONER:
Could you remind me about the question?MS. AMR:
She wanted an update on Somalia and Sudan.QUESTIONER:
I have a follow-up on Tunisia. How confident are you that the government
will implement on the reform?MR. AZOUR:
Sorry, could you repeat your question?QUESTIONER:
How confident are you in what the governments is currently doing in Tunisia
right now? That they will implement the reforms? Thank you.MS. AMR:
And the questions on Somalia and Sudan, were just, if you have any updates
on those.MR. AZOUR:
Well, on Somalia, as you know, in 2020, we have reached a decision point
for the HIPC initiative. And since both the government of Somalia, as well
as also the international community work together in order to prepare
Somalia to reach what we call the completion point and finalize the debt
relief operation. Government in Somalia has maintained the drive of reform
despite the various challenges. One is the impact of Covid. Second, is the
climate issues. As you know, Somalia is suffering at the same time from
drought as well as also as from the flood. In addition to that, a delayed
political process that has led recently to the election as well as also the
appointment of new cabinet.Therefore, the work with Somalia is progressing, despite the challenges.
Somalia has been able to address certain number of important challenges
including challenges related to food security. We recommend that Somalia
receives more grants as a support to address the food security issue,
especially giving the dire situation and the impact of climate issues on
Somalia.We expect that if things continue to move and the way they were moving
recently and according to our plan to achieve some time at end of 2023, the
process and reach a completion point. Sudan, as you know, the Fund has not
suspended its engagement with Sudan. We are following up on the situation,
especially economically and social situation that has also deteriorated
over time. Climate did not help. The increase in price of food and food
security issues are also issues that have delayed the process of
progressing in the HIPC initiative. As you know, we have an ECF with Sudan
that is expected to expire at the end of 2022.On Tunisia, well, one, we have to recognize that Tunisia, like several
countries in the region have been subjected in the last two years to severe
and successive shocks. Covid and the impact of Covid on an economy that is
open dependent on tourism was high climate issues. And recently the
increase in inflation, especially headline inflation, increase in price of
food and commodities. And, therefore, the government has recently put
together a team, and this team has managed to come up with a comprehensive
reform program. This program is a homegrown program, and that has been
discussed with the key stakeholders in the civil society in order to reach
a common ground on some of those priorities. Of course, the current
environment doesn\’t help, and therefore, in order to maintain stability and
accelerate growth, certain number of reforms are more important than
others.The Fund is supportive, has supported, as I mentioned earlier, so the case
of Tunisia twice in the last two years. And we are actively working with
the Tunisian authorities to find the best way to help them address those
challenges and accelerate through the program their capacity to regain, I
would say, their trajectory of growth.MS. AMR:
Thank you. Please go, gentlemen over there. Thank you.QUESTIONER:
Thank you. John Everton from the Banker. There\’s been an IMF visit to
Lebanon recently where there was frustration expressed about the pace of
reform there, following on from the SLA signed in April. Can you tell us
what your thoughts are about the probability of the reforms going through
and a wider deal being reached? Thank you.MS. AMR:
Thank you very much. And we do also have another question online from
Camille from MTV on Lebanon. How can the IMF convince leaders in Lebanon to
implement the demands of the International Monetary Fund?MR. AZOUR:
Well, first of all, as you know, we have reached staff level agreement
after a long period of discussions and program negotiation with the
authorities in order to help Lebanon address one of the most acute and
severe crisis for Lebanon in a century, and one of the most complex crisis
currently in the world. Based on this staff level agreement, there are
certain number of measures that are needed in order to not only to have the
program becoming effective, but also, to jump start reforms the Lebanese
economy.What are those measures? One is to pass a budget, which is an important and
basic milestones. This is your baseline year. Two is to address the issues
related to trust and confidence. And this is why certain number of measures
like the Bank Secrecy Law, as well as also, some reforms that are needed to
strengthen transparency and fight corruption. Those are very important to
restore confidence. Address the issue of the losses of the financial sector
that we are accumulated and are preventing Lebanon from the recovery, and
also, constitute the major liability on the balance sheet of the state.Those are important steps in order to allow the program to start, as I
said, and also to allow Lebanon to start the recovery and strengthen the
support of the international community. Progress has been made, but
progress has been slow. Only few measures have been so far implemented and
there is still progress on others.The Fund remains committed to support Lebanon as our Managing Director
mentioned earlier today, but I think it\’s very important for those basic
measures to be implemented and implemented on time, especially that Lebanon
is also subjected to other type of shocks. Food and food security issue is
an issue that Lebanon is facing in a very acute way. And some assistance
was provided by the World Bank and others to help Lebanon.In addition, also to the risk in terms of brain drain and other issues that
Lebanon is facing. We encourage the authorities to accelerate and pursue
those needed measures in order to have the program come into effect.MS. AMR:
Thank you, Jihad. We do have questions online. Mohmmad Aluban from Jordan’s
mamlaka TV. With the launch of economic reforms in Jordan. How will Jordan
overcome the problems of unemployment and poverty? And how can it reduce
the size of its large debt? Does the IMF have a new cooperation with Jordan
to support food security in the country?MR. AZOUR:
The Fund and Jordan have worked together in the last two years to help
Jordan mitigate the successive shock. We adjusted the program we had signed
with Jordan back in 2020 to provide the Jordanian authorities with the
capacity to respond to the Covid shock by allowing additional flexibility
on the fiscal management. And this was very helpful and allowed the
Jordanian government to save more lives and address livelihood of the
population. Over the last two years, Jordan was able to implement important
reforms that allowed Jordan to maintain its macroeconomic stability despite
the severe external shocks and the challenges that the Jordanian economy is
facing like other economies in the region. This is, of course, something
that allowed the Jordanian to maintain the confidence of investors and keep
inflation under control. Of course, like other parts of the world, the
Covid crisis has left important scars and one of them is on the level of
unemployment. Jordan had in the past an issue with youth unemployment and
this has been made more challenging with the Covid crisis. The best way to
address it, and this is the gist of our discussion with the authorities in
the context of the program that we still have with Jordan is how we
accelerate structural reforms. How we reduce cost of labor, how we reduce
the cost of energy, in order to allow the private sector to have a better
competitive position in order to invest and grow. Also, investing in
improving fiscal management is also a way for Jordan to keep not only its
public finance under control but also to provide confidence especially for
a country that has already high level of debt. Last but not the least there
are certain number of transformative projects that Jordan is currently
considering that will help improve business environment and we hope that
those projects will allow Jordan to address gradually the issue of
unemployment which I think this is one of our two key priorities for the
region is how to address unemployment, women’s participation in the economy
on one hand and also how to protect the population from the shock of
prices, price of food, price of fuel, and gas, and also the increase of
price of interest. Those are important shocks, exogenous shocks, that we
are working with the region, not only through financial support but also
through policy consultation and technical assistance to help them act very
quickly and swiftly to address those weaknesses and allow them to on one
hand protect their economies and benefit from the capacity to recovery.MS. AMR:
Thank you, Jihad. We do have a question on Pakistan, two questions,
actually, from Iram Abbasi from Voice of America. Will the IMF consider
rescheduling debt to Pakistan amid devastation due to floods if asked by
the Pakistani government? On Pakistan, Pakistan’s Finance Minister is
[inaudible) request, will the IMF grant some relief to Pakistan in terms of
repayment? The second question is on fuel prices in Pakistan. They have
been reduced. Do you think it’s a violation of the IMF deal? Also, how
confident you are with the current government to fulfill its commitments to
the IMF?MR. AZOUR:
Thank you, Wafa. Of course, we were saddened by the loss of human as well
as also livelihood in Pakistan with the flood and we presented, and we
reiterate our condolences for the people of Pakistan. As you know, the Fund
has been very supportive to Pakistan over the last period. We have a
program with Pakistan that has been extended and increased in size. This is
to help Pakistan deal with the confluence of shocks starting with the Covid
crisis where we provided additional flexibility.We accelerated some of our disbursement to recently the exogenous shocks
and the shock of increase in price of food and commodity. We had recently
completed a review that provided Pakistan with $1.2 billion and hopefully
we will be fielding a mission in November after the annual meetings to
Pakistan in order to start with the authorities preparing for the next
review. We are waiting currently for the assessment of the damages that
World Bank and UNDP are conducting in order to see what are on one hand the
repercussions on public finance and the impact on the economy and on the
society.Based on this assessment, we will need to update our numbers and based on
our discussion with the authorities, we will also listen to them to see
what are their priorities, and how the Fund can help. Of course, on the
issue of subsidy, as in other parts of the world, subsidy that is targeted
to support certain items has proved not to be very effective. I would say
it has proved to be very regressive. And in our regional economic outlook
we are again looking at this issue that is showing that this is not the
best way to use the very limited fiscal space that exists. Therefore, we
are encouraging Pakistan as well as also other countries to move from an
untargeted subsidy that is a waste of resources and to dedicate those
resources to those who need it. I give you one simple example. The region
spends on social protection 2 percent of GDP and in certain cases what
countries are spending on subsidies could be the double of that.Therefore, it’s very important to use this moment where challenges are
mounting, where increase in prices is hurting, to reallocate the resources
for those who need it most. And this is something that it’s not, I would
say, part of the IMF conditionalities, this is part of what is needed in
order to provide the right protection for those who need it at the time
where inflation is very high.MS. AMR:
Thank you, Jihad. Do we have any questions in the room? Yes, please, go
ahead.QUESTIONER:
Yes, thank you. Julian Pecquet, from The Africa Report. Just had a
follow-up question on Sudan, so if I heard you right, you said that you
have not suspended your assistance. I’m wondering, you know, how that’s
consistent with your push for a good governance after the coup and also a
number of other countries have suspended aid, have suspended debt relief.
As you probably know, the Sudanese finance minister is here making the
rounds, saying that that is undermining the country’s economic reforms. I
would love to get your thoughts on that. Thank you.MR. AZOUR:
In the context of the ACF, we have not suspended the relationship with
Sudan, but, as you know, we are having limited engagement with the Sudanese
authorities. We are following up on the situation, especially on the
economic and social situation that has deteriorated over the last year
because of confluence of issues. Of course, the HIPC process is a milestone
type of process, it’s not a time-bound process.There are certain number of important reforms and measures that need to be
implemented and that we are part of the program itself in order for Sudan
to reach what we call the completion point and have the debt relief
concluded. We have last year with the support of the international
community reached an important milestone with what we call the decision
point for one of the largest, I would say maybe the largest operation of
debt relief.We urge the authorities to accelerate both the reform agenda and the
transition in order to address the issues that have been compounded with
the food security shock, the climate issues, as well as also the social
deterioration.MS. AMR:
Thank you. We have one last question online from Bahrain. How do you see
possible global recession impacting the Gulf States?MR. AZOUR:
Well, the global recession is affecting countries in the region in
different ways because it is accompanied with increase in oil price and
commodities and for all exporting countries that has compensate for the
impact of increase in interest rates as well as also the potential or the
current slowdown that we see globally. In addition to that, countries in
the GCC were able to maintain lower level of inflation and have kept the
reform programs that they have started and that have helped them diversify
their source of revenues and not to go into, I would say, prosecutorial
policies. These have helped increase their reserves, strengthen their both
current account and fiscal accounts and reduce any pressure on markets. In
addition to that, some countries have already with the level of reserves
accumulated will be in less need for borrowing going forward in the
markets.MS. AMR:
Thank you very much, Jihad. This concludes our Press Briefing for the
Middle East and Central Asia Regional Economic Outlook. I would like to
thank you and all the journalists joining virtually for joining us. I would
like to remind you that the report for the Regional Economic Outlook will
be published on October 31st and please do join our Western Hem press
briefing at 3:00 p.m. today and the Asia Press Briefing at 7:00 p.m. today.
Thank you all again.
IMF Communications Department
MEDIA RELATIONS
PRESS OFFICER: Wafa Amr
Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org