Tag: Press

  • Finance Minister Ishaq Dar addresses press conference

    وزیر خزانہ اسحاق ڈار نے ایک اہم پریس کانفرنس کا آغاز پاکستان تحریک انصاف (پی ٹی آئی) کی سابقہ ​​حکومت میں ہونے والے معاشی اعداد و شمار شیئر کرکے کیا۔

    وزارت خزانہ نے قبل ازیں تصدیق کی تھی کہ سینیٹر اسلام آباد میں کانفرنس کریں گے۔ ڈار نے اس سے قبل دن کے دوران صحافیوں سے بات کرتے ہوئے بھی آگاہ کیا تھا۔

    جب ایک رپورٹر کی طرف سے پوچھا گیا کہ کیا وہ اپنے استعفیٰ کا اعلان کرنے کے لیے پریسر کو پکڑے ہوئے ہیں، تو ڈار نے استفسار کیا کہ کیا انہیں اپنے کام میں کوئی پریشانی ہے؟ انہوں نے ان پر زور دیا کہ \”4:10 بجے میری پریس کانفرنس کے لیے 2 گھنٹے انتظار کریں\”۔

    \”میں آپ سب کو اس میں شرکت کی دعوت دیتا ہوں،\” انہوں نے کہا۔

    جب ایک رپورٹر کی جانب سے بتایا گیا کہ فیڈرل بورڈ آف ریونیو کے سابق چیئرمین شبر زیدی چاہتے ہیں کہ ڈار استعفیٰ دیں تو انہوں نے پوچھا کہ انہوں نے (زیدی) نے ملک کے لیے کیا کیا ہے؟

    اس نے پاکستان کے لیے معاملات کو مزید خراب کیا اور پاکستان کو ڈیفالٹ کے دہانے پر لے جانے کے لیے اسے جیل میں ہونا چاہیے۔

    سابق وزیر خزانہ شوکت ترین سے جب ان کے خیالات کے بارے میں پوچھا گیا تو انہوں نے جواب دینے سے انکار کر دیا۔

    ڈار کی یہ پریس کانفرنس ایک ایسے وقت میں ہوئی ہے جب انٹر بینک مارکیٹ میں کرنسی کی قدر میں زبردست اتار چڑھاؤ دیکھا گیا ہے۔ 285.09 روپے کی اب تک کی کم ترین سطح پر پہنچ گئی۔ جمعرات کو 6.7 فیصد کی کمی کے بعد۔ تاہم، اگلے ہی دن، the روپے نے اپنے کچھ نقصانات کو پورا کیا۔، اور 280 کی سطح کے ارد گرد تجارت کر رہا تھا۔

    غیر مستحکم شرح تبادلہ a کے ساتھ مل کر آتی ہے۔ کم سطح زرمبادلہ کے ذخائر میں کمی اور ملک میں شدید معاشی بدحالی، جس کی وجہ سے ملک میں معاشی بحران بھی پیدا ہوا۔ اسٹیٹ بینک آف پاکستان (ایس بی پی) نے اہم پالیسی شرح میں اضافہ کر دیا۔ جمعرات کو 300 بنیادی پوائنٹس سے 20٪ تک۔

    جمعرات کو ڈار پاکستان کی معیشت پر قیاس آرائیوں کو ختم کرنے کی کوشش کی تھی۔، تحریر: \”پاکستان مخالف عناصر بدنیتی پر مبنی افواہیں پھیلا رہے ہیں کہ پاکستان ڈیفالٹ ہوسکتا ہے۔\”

    \”یہ نہ صرف مکمل طور پر غلط ہے بلکہ حقائق کو بھی جھوٹا ہے۔ تمام بیرونی واجبات وقت پر ادا کرنے کے باوجود SBP کے زرمبادلہ کے ذخائر بڑھ رہے ہیں اور چار ہفتے پہلے کے مقابلے میں تقریباً 1 بلین ڈالر زیادہ ہیں۔

    انہوں نے کہا کہ غیر ملکی کمرشل بینکوں نے پاکستان کو سہولیات دینا شروع کر دی ہیں۔

    بین الاقوامی مالیاتی فنڈ (آئی ایم ایف) کے ساتھ ہمارے مذاکرات مکمل ہونے والے ہیں اور ہم اگلے ہفتے تک آئی ایم ایف کے ساتھ اسٹاف لیول کے معاہدے پر دستخط کرنے کی توقع رکھتے ہیں۔ تمام اقتصادی اشارے آہستہ آہستہ درست سمت میں بڑھ رہے ہیں۔

    پاکستان آئی ایم ایف کی فنڈنگ ​​سے فنڈنگ ​​کی اگلی قسط حاصل کرنے سے قاصر رہا ہے جو کہ نقدی کے بحران کا شکار ملک کے لیے اہم ہے۔



    >Source link>

    >>Join our Facebook page From top right corner. <<

  • Finance Minister Ishaq Dar to hold press conference at 4:10pm

    وزیر خزانہ اسحاق ڈار جمعہ کی شام 4 بجکر 10 منٹ پر ایک اہم پریس کانفرنس کرنے والے ہیں۔

    وزارت خزانہ نے تصدیق کی کہ سینیٹر اسلام آباد میں کانفرنس کریں گے۔ ڈار نے اس سے قبل دن کے دوران صحافیوں سے بات کرتے ہوئے بھی آگاہ کیا تھا۔

    جب ایک رپورٹر کی طرف سے پوچھا گیا کہ کیا وہ اپنے استعفیٰ کا اعلان کرنے کے لیے پریسر کو پکڑے ہوئے ہیں، تو ڈار نے استفسار کیا کہ کیا انہیں اپنے کام میں کوئی پریشانی ہے؟ انہوں نے ان پر زور دیا کہ \”4:10 بجے میری پریس کانفرنس کے لیے 2 گھنٹے انتظار کریں\”۔

    \”میں آپ سب کو اس میں شرکت کی دعوت دیتا ہوں،\” انہوں نے کہا۔

    جب ایک رپورٹر کی جانب سے بتایا گیا کہ فیڈرل بورڈ آف ریونیو کے سابق چیئرمین شبر زیدی چاہتے ہیں کہ ڈار استعفیٰ دیں تو انہوں نے پوچھا کہ انہوں نے (زیدی) نے ملک کے لیے کیا کیا ہے؟

    اس نے پاکستان کے لیے معاملات کو مزید خراب کیا اور پاکستان کو ڈیفالٹ کے دہانے پر لے جانے کے لیے اسے جیل میں ہونا چاہیے۔

    سابق وزیر خزانہ شوکت ترین سے جب ان کے خیالات کے بارے میں پوچھا گیا تو انہوں نے جواب دینے سے انکار کر دیا۔

    ڈار کی یہ پریس کانفرنس ایک ایسے وقت میں ہوئی ہے جب انٹر بینک مارکیٹ میں کرنسی کی قدر میں زبردست اتار چڑھاؤ دیکھا گیا ہے۔ 285.09 روپے کی اب تک کی کم ترین سطح پر پہنچ گئی۔ جمعرات کو 6.7 فیصد کی کمی کے بعد۔ تاہم، اگلے ہی دن، the روپے نے اپنے کچھ نقصانات کو پورا کیا۔، اور 280 کی سطح کے ارد گرد تجارت کر رہا تھا۔

    غیر مستحکم شرح تبادلہ a کے ساتھ مل کر آتی ہے۔ کم سطح زرمبادلہ کے ذخائر میں کمی اور ملک میں شدید معاشی بدحالی، جس کی وجہ سے ملک میں معاشی بحران بھی پیدا ہوا۔ اسٹیٹ بینک آف پاکستان (ایس بی پی) نے اہم پالیسی شرح میں اضافہ کر دیا۔ جمعرات کو 300 بنیادی پوائنٹس سے 20٪ تک۔

    جمعرات کو ڈار پاکستان کی معیشت پر قیاس آرائیوں کو ختم کرنے کی کوشش کی تھی۔، تحریر: \”پاکستان مخالف عناصر بدنیتی پر مبنی افواہیں پھیلا رہے ہیں کہ پاکستان ڈیفالٹ ہوسکتا ہے۔\”

    \”یہ نہ صرف مکمل طور پر غلط ہے بلکہ حقائق کو بھی جھوٹا ہے۔ تمام بیرونی واجبات وقت پر ادا کرنے کے باوجود SBP کے زرمبادلہ کے ذخائر بڑھ رہے ہیں اور چار ہفتے پہلے کے مقابلے میں تقریباً 1 بلین ڈالر زیادہ ہیں۔

    انہوں نے کہا کہ غیر ملکی کمرشل بینکوں نے پاکستان کو سہولیات دینا شروع کر دی ہیں۔

    بین الاقوامی مالیاتی فنڈ (آئی ایم ایف) کے ساتھ ہمارے مذاکرات مکمل ہونے والے ہیں اور ہم اگلے ہفتے تک آئی ایم ایف کے ساتھ اسٹاف لیول کے معاہدے پر دستخط کرنے کی توقع رکھتے ہیں۔ تمام اقتصادی اشارے آہستہ آہستہ درست سمت میں بڑھ رہے ہیں۔

    حال ہی میں، پاکستان آئی ایم ایف کی فنڈنگ ​​سے فنڈنگ ​​کی اگلی قسط حاصل کرنے میں ناکام رہا ہے جو کہ نقدی کی تنگی کے شکار ملک کے لیے اہم ہے۔



    >Source link>

    >>Join our Facebook page From top right corner. <<

  • EU uses key telco stage to press the case for rethinking network funding

    یوروپی کمیشن نے ابھی تک اپنا واضح ترین اشارہ دیا ہے کہ وہ آنے والے سالوں میں بلاک میں انٹرنیٹ کنیکٹیویٹی کی مالی اعانت میں اہم مداخلت کرنے کا ارادہ رکھتا ہے۔

    موبائل انڈسٹری ایسوسی ایشن GSMA کے سالانہ تجارتی شو، موبائل ورلڈ کانگریس (MWC) میں آج صبح اسٹیج پر ایک کلیدی تقریر میں، یورپی یونین کے اندرونی مارکیٹ کمشنر تھیری بریٹن نے متنبہ کیا کہ موجودہ جنرل نیٹ ورکس \”بڑے پیمانے پر\” کے کام پر منحصر نہیں ہیں۔ تبدیلی\” ابھی شروع ہو رہی ہے، تیزی سے عمیق ٹیکنالوجیز جیسے کہ ورچوئل ورلڈز اور AI کی نئی ٹیکنالوجی جیسے منسلک کاروں اور سمارٹ شہروں میں ترقی کے ذریعے کارفرما ہے – جو تیز رفتار اور بینڈوتھ اور کم تاخیر پر انحصار کرتی ہے لیکن اپنے خلل ڈالنے والے وعدے کو پورا کرنے کے لیے بڑے پیمانے پر انٹر کنیکٹیوٹی پر انحصار کرتی ہے۔

    انہوں نے بارسلونا میں سالانہ ٹیلکو کانفرنس کے پہلے دن کے اوائل میں مندوبین کو بتایا کہ \”ہمیں بڑی سرمایہ کاری کے لیے ایک فنانسنگ ماڈل تلاش کرنے کی ضرورت ہوگی جو ہمارے یورپی حصول کے بنیادی عناصر کا احترام اور تحفظ کرے۔\” اختتامی صارفین کے لیے انتخاب کی آزادی کو یقینی بنانا اور نیٹ غیرجانبداری پر بلاک کے موجودہ قوانین کا احترام کرنے کے ساتھ ساتھ خدمات کے لیے منصفانہ، مسابقتی سطح کے کھیل کے میدان کو یقینی بنا کر مسابقتی آزادی فراہم کرنا۔

    یورپی یونین نے گزشتہ سال کے تحت اپنا مستقبل دیکھنے والا اسٹال لگایا ڈیجیٹل دہائی پالیسی پروگرام – جس میں کنیکٹیویٹی کے اہداف شامل ہیں، ساتھ ہی ڈیجیٹل مہارتوں، ڈیجیٹل کاروبار کو فروغ دینے کے منصوبے بھی شامل ہیں۔ لیکن نیٹ ورک کے بنیادی ڈھانچے کے ساتھ تمام چیزوں کا مرکز ڈیجیٹل ہے، یہاں کمیشن کے پالیسی اہداف نیٹ ورک کے بنیادی ڈھانچے کے ارتقاء سے جڑے ہوئے ہیں – جب اس علاقے میں ریگولیٹری منظر نامے کو تیار کرنے کے بارے میں بات چیت کی بات آتی ہے تو telcos کو ایک نئی ڈگری کا فائدہ دینا۔

    بریٹن نے آج اپنی تقریر میں تسلیم کیا کہ \”کنیکٹیوٹی انقلاب عمودی انضمام کے روایتی ماڈل کو سوال میں ڈال رہا ہے\”۔

    انہوں نے پیشین گوئی کی کہ \”ڈیجیٹل انڈسٹری کو وکندریقرت اور انٹرآپریبلٹی کی طرف بڑھنا ہو گا، کھلے، انٹرآپریبل سسٹمز تیار کرنے پر توجہ مرکوز کرتے ہوئے مختلف آلات اور ایپلیکیشنز کو ایک دوسرے سے مربوط اور موثر دنیا بنانے کے لیے مل کر کام کرنے کے قابل بنانا ہو گا۔\” (اور آرآج صبح اشارے پر جی ایس ایم اے نے ایک نئے صنعتی اقدام کا اعلان کیا۔ پر یونیورسل نیٹ ورک APIs کا ایک فریم ورک — جسے کہا جاتا ہے۔ جی ایس ایم اے کھولیں۔ گیٹ وےجس کے بارے میں کہا گیا ہے کہ \”ڈویلپرز کے لیے آپریٹر نیٹ ورکس تک آفاقی رسائی فراہم کرنے کے لیے ڈیزائن کیا جائے گا\” — بظاہر اسی طرح کے ہیمن شیٹ سے گانا۔)

    \”اصل منتقلی ویب 4.0 ہوگی جہاں ہر چیز بغیر کسی رکاوٹ کے آپس میں جڑی ہوئی ہے۔ ورچوئل جڑواں بچوں کے ساتھ، ہر چیز کی نقل، عمارت سے لے کر کار، انسانی جسم اور یہاں تک کہ سیارہ زمین تک کے رویے کا انتظام اور پیشین گوئی کرنا،\” بریٹن نے اپنی تقریر میں مزید پیش گوئی کی۔ \”یہ منتقلی سپر کمپیوٹنگ کے استعمال کے بغیر ممکن نہیں ہوگی۔ ہمیں ڈیٹا کی بڑی مقدار کو تیزی سے منتقل کرنے کے قابل ہونے کی ضرورت ہوگی۔ اور اس کو پوری دنیا میں انٹرآپریبل سسٹمز کے ذریعے زیر کیا جانا چاہیے۔

    \”دوسرے لفظوں میں، کل، ہر ایک کی جیب میں، اپنی گاڑی میں، اپنے گھر میں ایک سپر کمپیوٹر ہوگا۔\”

    کنیکٹیویٹی میں اس ضروری چھلانگ کو آگے بڑھانا وہی ہے جو خطرے میں ہے۔ EU نے جمعہ کو ایک مشاورت شروع کی۔انہوں نے کہا. یورپی یونین کی مشاورت مستقبل میں فکسڈ اور موبائل براڈ بینڈ نیٹ ورک کے بنیادی ڈھانچے کو کس طرح فنڈز فراہم کرنے کے بارے میں متعدد اختیارات پیش کرتی ہے — بشمول تمام ڈیجیٹل سروس فراہم کرنے والوں سے براہ راست ادائیگی کا امکان؛ یا نام نہاد \”بڑے ٹریفک جنریٹرز\” کے ذیلی سیٹ سے۔ (مؤخر الذکر وہی ہے جس کا telcos عوامی طور پر مطالبہ کر رہے ہیں۔)

    اسی وقت بلاک نے ایک ضابطے کے لیے ایک تجویز بھی اپنائی، گیگابٹ براڈ بینڈ ایکٹ، جس میں کہا گیا ہے کہ EU بھر میں گیگابٹ نیٹ ورکس کے تیز، سستے اور زیادہ موثر رول آؤٹ کو فعال کرنے کے لیے نئے قواعد پیش کیے جائیں گے۔

    \”صرف چند دن پہلے، ہم نے کنیکٹوٹی سیکٹر اور اس کے بنیادی ڈھانچے کے مستقبل کے بارے میں ایک وسیع مشاورت کا آغاز کیا۔ اس مشاورت کو بہت سے لوگوں نے بگ ٹیلکو اور بگ ٹیک کے درمیان منصفانہ شیئر پر جنگ کے طور پر بیان کیا ہے۔ ان لوگوں کے درمیان ایک بائنری انتخاب جو آج نیٹ ورک فراہم کرتے ہیں اور ان لوگوں کے درمیان جو انہیں ٹریفک کے ساتھ کھانا کھلاتے ہیں۔ لیکن مجھے واضح کرنے دو: بہت کچھ داؤ پر لگا ہوا ہے۔ یہ اس بارے میں نہیں ہے کہ آیا ایک مفاد کو دوسرے پر غالب ہونا چاہیے۔ یہ ہم سے آگے رابطے کے لیے بڑی چھلانگ حاصل کرنے کے بارے میں ہے،‘‘ بریٹن نے آگے کہا۔

    \”ہم اپنے 440 ملین شہریوں (480 ملین یوکرین کے ساتھ EU میں شامل ہونے کے راستے پر ہیں) کے ساتھ اپنی EU سنگل مارکیٹ کی زیادہ سے زیادہ صلاحیتوں سے فائدہ نہیں اٹھا رہے ہیں۔ اب وقت آگیا ہے کہ ہم یورپی یونین میں الیکٹرانک کمیونیکیشن فراہم کرنے والوں کے سرحد پار استحکام کی ممکنہ موجودہ رکاوٹوں کے ساتھ ساتھ ایک مربوط ریڈیو اسپیکٹرم مارکیٹ کے فوائد کے بارے میں سنجیدہ بحث کریں۔ میں ان دو مسائل کو اس وقت دوسرے براعظموں کے مقابلے میں ہماری اجتماعی صلاحیت کو روکے ہوئے دیکھتا ہوں۔

    \”ہم ایک نئے انقلاب کے آغاز پر ہیں،\” انہوں نے مزید کہا – تخلیقی تباہی کی طاقت کی طرف اشارہ کرتے ہوئے معاشی نظام کو متزلزل کرنے کی خواہش کا اشارہ دینے سے پہلے۔ \”آنے والے سالوں میں، پوری صنعت کو ایک بنیادی تبدیلی سے گزرنے اور اپنے کاروباری ماڈلز پر نظرثانی کرنے کی ضرورت ہوگی۔ کچھ لوگ اسے ایک کے طور پر بیان کرسکتے ہیں۔ Schumpeterian لمحہ. صنعت کو زندہ رہنے کے لیے ڈھالنا پڑے گا۔ یا، اسے مزید مثبت انداز میں ڈالنے کے لیے، کامیاب ہونے کے لیے ڈھال لیں۔\”

    ان کی تقریر کیریئرز ٹیلی فونیکا اور اورنج کے سی ای اوز کے ابتدائی کلیدی خطوط کے بعد ہوئی۔

    Jose Maria Alvarez-Pallete، CEO اور Telefonica کے چیئرمین، نے جڑ اور برانچ نیٹ ورک کی تبدیلی کی ایک تصویر پینٹ کی جو مستقبل کی خلل ڈالنے والی ٹیکنالوجیز (اور معاشی نمو) کو طاقت فراہم کرنے والے انجن کے طور پر کام کر رہی ہے — لیکن انہوں نے کہا کہ یہ تمام بنیادی تبدیلی ٹیلکوز کو حاصل کرنے پر منحصر ہے۔ نیٹ ورکس پر سب سے زیادہ ٹریفک پیدا کرنے والوں سے \”منصفانہ حصہ داری\”۔

    Alvarez-Pallete نے تجویز پیش کی کہ کیریئرز اپنے بنیادی ڈھانچے کو دوبارہ بنانے کے لیے کام کرنے کے لیے تیار اور تیار ہیں – جسے انھوں نے \”بڑے پیمانے پر وکندریقرت سپر کمپیوٹر\” کے طور پر بیان کیا ہے – اور نئے کاروباری ماڈلز کو اس دور کے مطابق ڈھالنے کے لیے تیار کریں جہاں ان کے دوبارہ تشکیل شدہ پائپ ایک \”جدت\” کے طور پر کام کر رہے ہوں۔ پلیٹ فارم\” (یا ہر طرح کی خلل ڈالنے والی ایپس کے لیے ایک \”ریئل ٹائم میسیو ایبلر\”)۔ لیکن اس نے استدلال کیا کہ کیریئرز ماحولیاتی نظام سے اس سے کہیں زیادہ \”متوازن\” شراکت کے مستحق ہیں جو وہ فی الحال حاصل کر رہے ہیں – بگ ٹیک کو ان کی (مقبول) خدمات سے پیدا ہونے والی ٹریفک کے لیے اپنا حصہ ڈالنے کی ضرورت ہے۔

    اورنج کے سی ای او کرسٹل ہیڈمین اپنے پیغام میں اور بھی دو ٹوک تھے: یہ دلیل دیتے ہوئے کہ یورپی ٹیلی کام مکمل طور پر \”متضاد\” صورتحال میں ہیں جس کے تحت ان کے نیٹ ورکس کو اہم سماجی انفراسٹرکچر کے طور پر تسلیم کیا جاتا ہے اور اس کے باوجود انہوں نے کہا کہ انہیں \”بڑے پیمانے پر\” سرمایہ کاری کرنے کی ضرورت ہے۔ منیٹائز\”، صارفین کے ساتھ ہمیشہ کم ادائیگی اور زیادہ حاصل کرنے کی توقع رکھتے ہیں۔

    \”پورا شعبہ ایک دوراہے پر ہے،\” اس نے صورتحال کو \”غیر پائیدار\” قرار دیتے ہوئے خبردار کیا – اور یورپی ٹیلی کاموں کے ایک سروے کا حوالہ دیا جس میں تقریباً نصف پولنگ چیف ایگزیکٹس نے کہا کہ وہ توقع نہیں کرتے کہ ان کے کاروبار ایک اور دہائی تک اس میں کامیاب ہوں گے۔

    \”منصفانہ کھیل کے اصول آج کی غیر متوازن صورتحال کو تسلیم کرنے کے ساتھ شروع ہوتے ہیں،\” انہوں نے مزید کہا، یورپی یونین کے قانون سازوں پر زور دیتے ہوئے کہ \”اس بات کو تسلیم کریں کہ ٹیلکو انڈسٹری ہماری معیشتوں میں سب سے بڑا تعاون کرنے والوں میں سے ایک رہی ہے\”۔ اور کیریئرز کی شکایت کو قبول کرنے کے لیے کہ یہ غیر منصفانہ ہے کہ ان پر اربوں کی لاگت کی جائے جب کہ مٹھی بھر بڑے ٹریفک جنریٹر اپنے نیٹ ورکس کے اوپر سوار ہو کر بینک تک ہنستے ہوئے جاتے ہیں۔

    مستقبل کے نیٹ ورکس کے لیے ایک \”مناسب فنڈنگ ​​فریم ورک\” کو ان بڑے آن لائن ٹریفک جنریٹرز پر توجہ مرکوز کرنی چاہیے، اس نے زور دیا – EU کی مشاورت کو \”کھلے لیکن منصفانہ\” مستقبل کی جانب \”پہلا قدم\” قرار دیا۔

    اگرچہ بریٹن کی تقریر نے لفظی طور پر ٹیلکوز کے مطالبات کے سامنے ہتھیار ڈالنے کی بات نہیں کی، لیکن یورپی یونین کا موڈ میوزک انڈسٹری کے سوٹ سے بھرے سامعین کو ضرور خوش کرے گا۔

    کمشنر نے MWC کے مندوبین کو بتایا کہ ان کے لیے ان کا پیغام یہ ہے کہ وہ \”مشترکہ طور پر ہمارے 2030 کے اہداف تک پہنچنے کے لیے میرے عزم پر بھروسہ کر سکتے ہیں\” – وہ اہداف جو بلاک کا مطالبہ کرتے ہیں کہ ان کی تقریر بھی \”کنیکٹیویٹی انقلاب\” کے طور پر اس بات کو حاصل کرتی ہے۔

    انہوں نے مزید کہا کہ \”مشاورت یقیناً اس پہیلی کا صرف ایک حصہ ہے جسے ہم پچھلے کچھ سالوں سے اکٹھا کر رہے ہیں۔\” \”خواتین و حضرات، آئیے آج کی آنکھوں سے دنیا کو دیکھنا چھوڑ دیں، یا عقبی آئینے کو دیکھنا چھوڑ دیں۔ آئیے مستقبل پر توجہ مرکوز کریں، جہاں ہم بننا چاہتے ہیں اور وہاں جانے کے لیے ہمیں کن اقدامات کی ضرورت ہے۔

    \”میں آپ سب کو اس عکاسی میں حصہ لینے کی ترغیب دیتا ہوں۔ جب بھی کوئی بڑا تکنیکی انقلاب آیا ہے، یورپ آیا ہے، اور اس بار، میں چاہتا ہوں کہ یورپ بھی آئے۔ ہم کنیکٹیویٹی کے شعبے میں جس تکنیکی انقلاب کا تجربہ کر رہے ہیں اس کی قیادت کرنے اور اسے ایک یورپی انقلاب کے طور پر تیار کرنے کا موقع ضائع نہیں کر سکتے۔\”

    \"TechCrunch



    >Source link>

    >>Join our Facebook page From top right corner. <<

  • BBC tax raids put India press freedom in spotlight

    نئی دہلی: صرف ہفتوں بعد بی بی سی 2002 کے مہلک فرقہ وارانہ فسادات میں بھارتی وزیر اعظم نریندر مودی کے کردار کی جانچ کرنے والی ایک دستاویزی فلم نشر کی گئی، ٹیکس انسپکٹرز براڈکاسٹر کے دفاتر پر اترے۔

    مودی کی ہندو قوم پرست بھارتیہ جنتا پارٹی کا کہنا ہے کہ دونوں آپس میں جڑے ہوئے نہیں ہیں، لیکن انسانی حقوق کی تنظیموں کا کہنا ہے۔ بی بی سی اس ہفتے کے چھاپے دنیا کی سب سے بڑی جمہوریت میں آزادی صحافت کی غیر تسلی بخش حالت کو ظاہر کرتے ہیں۔

    نامناسب رپورٹنگ شائع کرنے والے خبر رساں ادارے خود کو قانونی کارروائی کا نشانہ بناتے ہیں، جب کہ حکومت پر تنقید کرنے والے صحافیوں کو ہراساں کیا جاتا ہے اور یہاں تک کہ قید بھی کیا جاتا ہے۔

    کا تین روزہ لاک ڈاؤن بی بی سی کا نئی دہلی اور ممبئی میں دفاتر میڈیا ہاؤسز کے خلاف اسی طرح کی کئی \”سرچ اینڈ سروے\” کارروائیوں کا تازہ ترین واقعہ ہے۔

    \”بدقسمتی سے، یہ ایک رجحان بنتا جا رہا ہے، اس سے کوئی ہچکچاہٹ نہیں ہے،\” کمیٹی ٹو پروٹیکٹ جرنلسٹس کے کنال مجمدار نے بتایا۔ اے ایف پی.

    انہوں نے کہا کہ کم از کم چار ہندوستانی دکانوں پر جنہوں نے حکومت پر تنقید کی تھی گزشتہ دو سالوں میں ٹیکس افسران یا مالی جرائم کے تفتیش کاروں نے چھاپے مارے تھے۔

    کے ساتھ کے طور پر بی بی سیان دکانوں نے کہا کہ اہلکاروں نے صحافیوں کے زیر استعمال فون اور کمپیوٹر تک رسائی حاصل کی۔

    بھارتی ٹیکس انسپکٹر بی بی سی کے ملازمین کے موبائل اور لیپ ٹاپ کی جانچ کر رہے ہیں۔

    مجمدار نے مزید کہا، \”جب آپ کے پاس حکام آپ کے مواد کو دیکھنے کی کوشش کر رہے ہیں، تو اپنے کام کو دیکھیں، یہ دھمکی ہے۔\”

    \”عالمی برادری کو بیدار ہونا چاہیے اور اس معاملے کو سنجیدگی سے لینا چاہیے۔\”

    2014 میں مودی کے اقتدار سنبھالنے کے بعد سے رپورٹرز ودآؤٹ بارڈرز کے مرتب کردہ ورلڈ پریس فریڈم انڈیکس میں ہندوستان 10 درجے گر کر 150 ویں نمبر پر آ گیا ہے۔

    صحافیوں کو طویل عرصے سے ہندوستان میں اپنے کام کے لیے ہراساں کیے جانے، قانونی دھمکیوں اور دھمکیوں کا سامنا ہے لیکن فری اسپیچ کلیکٹیو کے مطابق، صحافیوں کے خلاف پہلے سے کہیں زیادہ مجرمانہ مقدمات درج کیے جا رہے ہیں۔

    مقامی سول سوسائٹی گروپ نے رپورٹ کیا کہ 2020 میں ریکارڈ 67 صحافیوں کے خلاف مجرمانہ شکایات جاری کی گئیں، تازہ ترین سال جس کے اعداد و شمار دستیاب ہیں۔

    رپورٹرز ودآؤٹ بارڈرز کے مطابق، سال کے آغاز میں بھارت میں دس صحافی سلاخوں کے پیچھے تھے۔

    سی پی جے نے بھارتی حکام پر زور دیا کہ وہ صحافیوں کو ہراساں کرنا بند کریں۔

    ایک بار گرفتار ہونے کے بعد، رپورٹرز اپنے خلاف مقدمات عدالتوں کے ذریعے آگے بڑھنے کے انتظار میں مہینوں یا سال بھی گزار سکتے ہیں۔

    \’ڈرتے کیوں ہو؟\’

    بی بی سی کی دستاویزی فلم میں ریاست گجرات کے وزیر اعلیٰ کے طور پر مودی کے وقت کو مذہبی فسادات کے دوران دریافت کیا گیا ہے جس میں کم از کم 1,000 افراد ہلاک ہوئے تھے، جن میں زیادہ تر اقلیتی مسلمان تھے۔

    پروگرام میں برطانوی وزارت خارجہ کی رپورٹ کا حوالہ دیا گیا جس میں دعویٰ کیا گیا تھا کہ مودی نے سینئر پولیس افسران سے ملاقات کی اور انہیں دائیں بازو کے ہندو گروپوں کے مسلم مخالف تشدد میں مداخلت نہ کرنے کا حکم دیا۔

    دو حصوں پر مشتمل سیریز میں a بی بی سی فسادات کے فوراً بعد مودی کا انٹرویو، جس میں ان سے پوچھا گیا کہ کیا وہ اس معاملے کو مختلف طریقے سے ہینڈل کر سکتے تھے۔

    مودی نے جواب دیا کہ ان کی سب سے بڑی کمزوری یہ نہ جاننا ہے کہ \”میڈیا کو کیسے ہینڈل کیا جائے\”۔

    ہندوستان کے کاروان میگزین کے پولیٹیکل ایڈیٹر ہرتوش سنگھ بال نے بتایا کہ \”یہ وہ چیز ہے جس کا وہ تب سے خیال رکھے ہوئے ہیں۔\” اے ایف پی. \”یہ اس کے رویے کا خلاصہ کرتا ہے۔\”

    حکام نے سوشل میڈیا پر اس کے پھیلاؤ کو روکنے کی کوشش میں پروگرام کے لنکس کے اشتراک پر پابندی لگانے کے لیے انفارمیشن ٹیکنالوجی کے قوانین کا استعمال کیا۔

    بی جے پی کے ترجمان، گورو بھاٹیہ نے کہا کہ اس ہفتے کے چھاپے بی بی سی دفاتر قانونی تھے اور وقت کا دستاویزی فلم کی نشریات سے کوئی تعلق نہیں تھا۔

    انہوں نے نامہ نگاروں سے کہا کہ اگر آپ ملک کے قانون پر عمل کر رہے ہیں، اگر آپ کے پاس چھپانے کے لیے کچھ نہیں ہے تو قانون کے مطابق کارروائی سے کیوں ڈرتے ہیں۔

    \’بدتمیزی اور فرقہ وارانہ حملے\’

    بھارت میں ناخوشگوار رپورٹنگ نہ صرف حکومت کی طرف سے قانونی دھمکیاں دے سکتی ہے بلکہ عوام کے ارکان کی طرف سے خوفناک ردعمل بھی سامنے آ سکتا ہے۔

    رپورٹرز وِدآؤٹ بارڈرز نے پچھلے سال کہا تھا، ’’وہ ہندوستانی صحافی جو حکومت پر بہت زیادہ تنقید کرتے ہیں، مودی کے عقیدت مندوں کی طرف سے ہر طرح کی ہراسانی اور حملے کی مہم کا نشانہ بنتے ہیں۔

    واشنگٹن پوسٹ کے کالم نگار رانا ایوب 2002 کے گجرات فسادات میں مبینہ طور پر سرکاری افسران کے ملوث ہونے کی خفیہ تحقیقات کرنے کے بعد سے مودی کے حامیوں کا مسلسل نشانہ بنے ہوئے ہیں۔

    بی بی سی انڈیا کے دفاتر پر ٹیکس چھاپے دوسرے روز میں داخل

    اسے آن لائن ڈس انفارمیشن بیراج کا نشانہ بنایا گیا ہے، جس میں ڈاکٹری ٹوئٹس بھی شامل ہیں جس میں بتایا گیا ہے کہ اس نے بچوں کے ریپ کرنے والوں کا دفاع کیا تھا اور ایک رپورٹ جس میں منی لانڈرنگ کے الزام میں اس کی گرفتاری کا جھوٹا اعلان کیا گیا تھا۔

    اقوام متحدہ کے مقرر کردہ ماہرین نے پچھلے سال اس کے کیس کا ذکر کیا اور کہا کہ اس نے \”بے لگام بدسلوکی اور فرقہ وارانہ حملوں\” کو برداشت کیا ہے۔

    ان کا یہ بھی کہنا تھا کہ ایوب کو بھارتی حکام نے ہراساں کرنے کی مختلف اقسام کا نشانہ بنایا، جس میں ٹیکس فراڈ اور منی لانڈرنگ کے الزامات پر اس کے بینک اکاؤنٹس کو منجمد کرنا بھی شامل ہے۔



    Source link

  • 170 Arab Ke Mazeed Taxes | Ishaq Dar Important Press Conference | Pakistan IMF deal

    \"\"


    روزنامہ قدرت کی تازہ ترین خبریں پڑھیں
    http://dailyqudrat.pk
    ___________________________________________________

    تازہ ترین ویڈیوز کے لیے چینل کو سبسکرائب کریں۔



    Source link

  • Transcript of IMF Press Briefing


    Transcript of IMF Press Briefing







    July 14, 2022
















    MR. RICE: Well, good morning everyone. Welcome to this Press Briefing on
    behalf of the International Monetary Fund. I’m Gerry Rice of the
    Communication Department and as usual, our briefing this morning will be
    embargoed until 10:30 a.m., that’s Washington time. Let me make a few quick
    announcements and then turn to your questions. Great to see so many
    colleagues on the screen here. And I’ve got some online as well, we’ll take
    as many as we can today. So several announcements – Kristalina Georgieva,
    the Managing Director is in Indonesia for the meeting of the G20 Finance
    Ministers and Central Bank Governors, which is taking place there as I’m
    sure you know. You will have seen her blog published yesterday as her
    preview from the Fund’s perspective of the G20 agenda, so I know many of
    you reported on that. And from there, she will move on to Japan, and she
    will be meeting with officials and speak at the 25th Anniversary of the
    IMF’s Regional Office there in Tokyo and will be posting that for you.
    We’ll keep you apprised indeed of all that she’s doing on this Asia trip. I
    want to remind you –- I know it’s on your calendars, that the update on our
    World Economic Outlook will be on July 26th –- Tuesday, July 26 th at 9:00 o’clock and that will be with our Chief Economist,
    the Fund’s Economic Counselor, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas. Pierre-Olivier
    will have a press conference with you on that day, and you’ll be able to
    join it via IMF.org, social media and so on. That’s July 26th -–
    that’s the WEO update, okay guys. Finally, we announced earlier this week
    that the annual meetings which will be from October 10th to October 16 th. I know it seems far away, but as you also know it comes up
    very quickly, but we did announce earlier this week that the Annual
    Meetings this year will take place in person. So, these are the first
    in-person meetings since the pandemic.So look forward to seeing you all at
    the annual meetings in D.C. in person. That would — really will be that’s
    something very, very nice to see all of you. Okay, that’s it on the
    announcements. So let me turn to your questions. I want to turn to first of
    all, Olivier RO from RFI -– Radio Rogez from Radio France International
    because he’s joining us for the first time. He’s having a little bit of
    difficulty with his —- I can see him there but he’s having a little bit of
    difficulty with his camera, and I think with his microphone. I don’t think
    you can come in, Olivier in which case you’ve just sent your questions and
    I’ll take them. One is on debt. And Olivier’s asking, what’s blocking
    progress for the three countries that have asked for more than a year to be
    part of the G20 common framework, and why a year after no decision has been
    taken on the restructuring of their debt. So that’s Olivier’s question.
    He’s got a second question I will come to in a moment on the resilience and
    sustainability trust, and I will take your question on that too Olivier.
    But I want to ask because I know it’s very much on you minds. Does anyone
    else have a question on debt or on the common framework, or the three
    countries that Olivier refers to which as you know are Chad, Zambia and
    Ethiopia. If you have a question on that please come in. I see David.
    David, come on in. Anyone else just raise your hand and we’ll take a
    cluster on these questions on that. David.

    QUESTIONER: Hi Jerry. Thanks, good to see you after so many weeks. So,
    there are a lot of meetings here. There’s finally some move here to Chad,
    Ethiopia, and Zambia. Just wondering if you can give us an update on those
    talks. You know, there was an earlier meeting for Chad on Wednesday. Do you
    anticipate that there will be some sort of contingency arrangement based on
    the price of oil? Because some of the creditors have been concerned that,
    because of the high price of oil, they think Chad may no longer need a
    restructuring. And if you could also comment on the other recent scandal in
    Chad over embezzlement of funds from the National Oil Company, if that is a
    factor in these talks. On Ethiopia, you know, there’s been some indication
    that the United States has been an impediment to the deal there because of
    its concerns about the ongoing civil war and so, you know, what is
    realistic to expect from a creditor meeting on Monday. And then Zambia also
    another meeting on Monday. Are you expecting official creditors to make
    some commitments necessary to unlock IMF funding there. Thank you.

    MR. RICE: Thanks David. Very comprehensive –-

    QUESTIONER: Lot’s to get through.

    MR. RICE: Very comprehensive. Anyone else want to come in on this one? Yes,
    Shabtai, hi. Good to see you Shabtai. Good to see you the other day.
    Fantastic event at Devex. Congratulations.

    QUESTIONER: Thank you very much. David asked a lot of what I was going to
    ask and more, but I’ll just add that there are some countries like Ghana
    that are now coming to the IMF for different types of assistance.
    Obviously, these talks are going to take some time. I was curious if the
    IMF has any ability to do any fast disbursements for these countries, so
    that they can get over the immediate hurdles and not face serious balance
    of payment crisis. And then Secretary Yellen this morning called out China
    specifically on the common framework saying, you know, they she’s not
    seeing real progress. I was wondering if that’s going to be on the Managing
    Director’s agenda at the G20 as well. Sort of get China to do more on debt
    relief.

    MR. RICE: Thanks, Shabtai. Simon, welcome. Simon, not hearing you. You may
    have to switch on.

    QUESTIONER: Okay, great.

    MR. RICE: Gotha, yep.

    QUESTIONER: Good. So, thank you for taking my question. This is Simon Ateba
    at Today News Africa and Washington. On Ethiopia, I just wanted to know how
    you approach the situation. Do you need to wait until the civil war is over
    or do you –- I just want to understand, to, you know, how you approach it
    and then I have other questions. I don’t know if I can ask them now or wait
    for you to come back.

    MR. RICE: Okay Simon. Anyone else on this clutch of issues in countries.
    Otherwise, I can give you what I’ve got. Good. So, broadly to begin with on
    debt again, I want to refer to what Kristalina Georgieva has been saying in
    recent days including this Devex event where we were with Shabtai. And
    including in the blog yesterday. If you haven’t seen it, what she’s been
    saying on debt really warning of the serious potential challenges facing
    the world on the debt front. But she said in the blog we need decisive
    actions now and she said time is not on our side, and she was urging large
    lenders, both sovereign and private to step up and play their part. So, you
    know, I think that was kind of a response to some of the issues that you’ve
    been raising. More specifically, again we’ve been saying that a third of
    emerging markets and developing economies are in debt distress, and for
    low-income countries it’s worse than that. It’s actually nearly twice as
    high, it’s 60 percent. So, the risk of debt crisis is increasing again as
    the Managing Director has been warning and urgency is the word. No time for
    complacency. And she will certainly be bringing that message to the G20 as
    it meets over these next couple of days. So, what can I tell you on the
    three specific countries that David and others mentioned. Let me just -–
    I’ll tell you what I have, and you can follow-up though I don’t really have
    much more on the specifics of the countries. But the three creditor
    committees for Chad, for Zambia and Ethiopia are all set to meet in the
    coming days, this month. And I think Kristalina Georgieva was the first one
    to indicate that that was happening and that is happening. So let me just
    go through them quickly. On Chad, again as Olivier said it was one of the
    first countries to request a debt treatment. I can say that progress has
    been made in our discussions with Chad on the overall macroeconomic
    framework and reforms that could underly the first review of the program,
    the extended credit facility that we have with Chad but that’s staff level
    agreement, which as you know is a crucial first step, remains conditioned
    on sufficient financing assurances as is the case with all our programs,
    and that includes an agreement on the necessary debt treatment.

    Again, consistent with Fund Program parameters, we need financing
    assurances, and we need assurance on debt sustainability. So, the Creditor
    Committee on Chad, we expect to continue to meet. We think it’s essential.
    Again, that an agreement be reached promptly with all creditors, including
    Glenn Core to allow us to submit this first review under the ongoing
    arrangement that we have with Chad, and we’d then be able to put that to
    our Executive Board as soon as we possibly can, and try and provide the
    necessary financial support that Chad needs in this time of crisis. So,
    again, those of you who follow the Fund, you understand what I’m saying
    here. The staff-level agreement followed by approval of our Board is
    standard procedure. So, that’s on Chad.

    On Zambia, a second meeting of Zambia’s Creditor Committee we expect to
    take place in the next week or so, and if official creditors can succeed in
    providing the financing assurances, again, to Zambia within the next few
    weeks, we can then take that to our Board for consideration of a program;
    and, you know, that could happen very soon after our Board recess, which is
    the first couple of weeks in August. So, we would be looking at probably
    around early September for that. Again, provided these steps are taken.
    That’s on Zambia.

    On Ethiopia: well, we welcome that the Creditor Committee has been formed
    for Ethiopia, again, under this G20 common framework, and we have been and
    will continue to work closely to provide the needed technical support to
    the work of that Creditor Committee for Ethiopia and, specifically, we will
    meet with the Creditor Committee for Ethiopia the week of July 18th to
    update them what we see as the economic situation in Ethiopia. I know a
    number of you were asking about the political circumstances, and so on in
    Ethiopia. I don’t have anything on that, but we will be updating on the
    economic situation for Ethiopia with the Creditor Committee for that
    country the week of July 18.

    That’s all I have on the three countries. You can follow up, but I can tell
    now, I really don’t have much more than that, but you’re welcome to follow
    up.

    Shabtai asked about Ghana, in addition to those three countries. Shabtai,
    you may have seen the statement we issued last night on Ghana. I see that
    you did; good. So, I’m not going to repeat. It’s a fairly comprehensive
    statement. I’m not going to repeat all that’s in there, Shabtai; but,
    essentially, for those of you who haven’t seen it, we had been in
    discussions with Ghana. They have requested an IMF program to support their
    homegrown economic program. We did have an IMF staff mission in Accra from
    July 6 through yesterday, the 13th; and then, as we pretty much always do,
    we issued an end-of-mission statement. So, we’re at an early stage with
    Ghana in the discussions for a program, and those discussions will
    continue. I refer you to the ‑‑ I can say more but I’d really just be
    repeating what’s in a very comprehensive statement on Ghana, and it’s right
    there on the website.

    Shabtai added to his question. Well, can the IMF do more, and can you do
    something faster? So, you know, just a reminder that in this crisis over
    the last couple of years, we have moved faster in an unprecedented way for
    the IMF in terms of speed with our emergency financing, with our direct
    debt relief and, of course, there was the SDR allocation less than a year
    ago.

    So, you know, we’re doing as much as we can, looking to do as much as we
    can, Shabtai, and I’m sure you’re watching almost, you know, on a
    week-by-week, and sometimes day-by-day basis. There’s plenty of action,
    plenty of support going to countries from the IMF just in recent days.
    Moldova, the $171 million to Senegal, the $456 million to Mozambique, the
    $638 million recently to Benin. And, of course, emergency financing through
    our facilities can still be provided when members face urgent balance of
    payment problems and, what we call, and upper-traded trench regular program
    is either not feasible or not necessary. But just to say, this is not a
    static situation, we’re really moving every day, and I’ve just given a few
    examples there of the types of support we’ve been providing.

    We’ve taken a bit of time on this. It’s an important, it’s a crucial issue.
    I’m sure it will feature; it will loom large at the G20.

    Does anyone want to come back on that common framework? If not, I’ll leave
    it there and let me just take Olivier’s other question. I’ll try and take
    it quickly and then I’ll come to Argentina because I see a number of
    colleagues raising their hands.

    But, again, Olivia’s asking on the RST, how does it work? What’s the
    timeline? Where are you on funding, et. cetera. So, again, Olivier, there’s
    actually a lot of information on our website on the RST. There’s a really
    good Q&A and you can find a lot of the stuff there. But, you are
    correct. This is a very important, we think, new instrument for the IMF.
    We’ve never had anything like this before, focused on the macro-critical
    challenges facing countries, but the longer-term structural challenges with
    macroeconomic implications, we have not had that kind of instrument.
    Before, the IMF, as you know, normally, does short-term financing. So, this
    is new and it’s focused on resilience, sustainability issues. Most notably,
    climate change, pandemic preparedness, but other issues too. It covers a
    wide range of countries, certainly low and vulnerable low-income countries,
    but also vulnerable middle-income countries and fragile states undertaking
    structural reforms. It covers, we estimate, about three-quarters of our
    membership. That’s three-quarters of 190.

    As I said, long-term financing, this is new. Twenty-year maturity,
    10-1/2-year grace period, and low interest rates, and eligibility is high
    quality policy measures, a concurrent financing or non-financing
    arrangement with the IMF, sustainable debt ‑‑ I mentioned that earlier.
    That’s true of all of our programs. And, you know, capacity to repay the
    fund. All of that, again, standard stuff for our other programs.

    We aim for the RST to leverage additional financing, not just IMF financing
    from official and non-official sources. Where do we stand on funding? Our
    initial aspiration is to get to $45 billion. We stand at close to $40. We
    are at $37 billion, about $37 billion right now, and we’re hoping to get to
    the $45 really soon. And, when will it all kick in? We aim to start RST
    lending by around the time of our annual meetings in the Fall. So, it’s not
    far away. It’s coming up in the early part of October. Again, depending on
    securing the sufficient funding, but the bottom line is very good progress
    on the RST, on this new instrument. Thanks for the question.

    Colleagues from Argentina. I see Liliana. I see Raphael. Liliana. And I see
    Juan Manuel. Hi, guys. Come on in. Liliana, you first.

    QUESTIONER: Okay, thank you. Thank you, Gerry. While we have a new Minister
    of Economies, Silvina Batakis, and my question is did the Minister,
    Batakis, discuss with the IMF staff to change the goals agreed in the
    program. I’m referring as an example, for instance, the fiscal goal to
    reduce the fiscal deficit to 2.5. Are conversations going ahead in this
    point? Thank you, Gerry.

    MR. RICE: Thank you, Lilliana. Raphael or Juan Manuel, do you want to add?

    QUESTIONER: Yes, thanks, Gerry. Two questions. MD Georgieva said in an
    interview with Reuters that some painful actions might be needed. I was
    hoping you could clarify what exactly did she mean by painful actions. And
    a second question. Does the IMF still categorize Argentina’s program as
    credible and realistic? Are you sticking with that characterization of the
    program? Thanks.

    MR. RICE: Hey, thanks, Raphael. Nice to see you. Juan Manuel, come on in.

    QUESTIONER: Hi, Gerry, and everyone. Well, the first question. What can we
    know about the second quarterly review of Argentina’s program; and,
    secondly, similar to what Raphael asked, the new minister of the economy
    announced this week a plan, a fiscal plan. So, my question is: are these
    measures match with the need of painful actions mentioned by the Managing
    Director, Kristalina Georgieva?

    MR. RICE: Thanks, Juan Manuel. I\’m seeing Patricia. Hi, Patricia. Come on
    in.

    QUESTIONER: Hi, Gerry. Also, in tune with my colleagues, I would like to
    ask if there is a meeting coming up, agreed to meet the new members of the
    Argentine economic team? And when can we expect the next review?

    MR. RICE: Good. Thanks, Patricia. Rodrigo, are you looking to come in on
    Argentina? I see your hand raised. Is this on Argentina or something else?

    QUESTIONER: Thank you, Gerry. Anything I had on Argentina my colleagues
    asked. I want to ask about Ukraine. So, you can come back to me later.

    MR. RICE: All right. I\’ll come back to you then, Rodrigo, yes. So, thanks,
    guys, for that clutch of questions on Argentina. Let me give you what I
    have.

    So, last week, just within the past week, our Managing Director, Kristalina
    Georgieva, and our Director for the Western Hemisphere Department, whom you
    all know, Ilan Goldfajn, they each had calls with Minister Batakis. And the
    Managing Director issued a short statement after her call. She
    characterized it as a very good call with the Minister where they discussed
    the implementation of the ongoing program, Argentina\’s program, supported
    by the IMF. And the way she put it was we\’re looking forward to continuing
    our constructive engagement to promote economic stability and inclusive
    growth in Argentina in this very challenging global environment that
    Argentina and pretty much every country is facing right now.

    I can add to that, again, responding to some of your questions. I hope that
    our staff, team on Argentina, including our resident representative in
    Buenos Aires are already engaging with the Minister and her technical team.
    As you know, and as some of you mentioned, the Minister recently and
    publicly reiterated her commitment to implement the Fund supported program
    and the agreed program objectives.

    And the announced measures referred to by the Minister are consistent with
    the objectives of the program that had been agreed to strengthen
    macroeconomic stability and begin tackling Argentina\’s deep seated
    challenges, specifically in what the Minister said, we welcome efforts to
    strengthen expenditure controls, tax compliance, and public debt management
    coordination. So, we continue to engage with the Minister and her team as
    they work to implement their economic program that\’s supported by the Fund.

    Someone asked, maybe it was Juan Manuel, about the second review and that\’s
    expected to take place in September. And we will communicate about that in
    due course.

    So, the bottom line I think is, you know, questions were asked about where
    is the program? Are the objectives still the same? Is it realistic, and so
    on? To which, you know, I would just refer to what I\’ve just said and what
    the Minister has said, that the objectives remain. And I would, again,
    repeat that we have had a very positive initial engagement with the
    Minister. And we look forward to continuing to work constructively to
    achieve the agreed objectives. And that\’s where the focus of the
    discussions is, and those discussions are ongoing.

    Martin, you didn\’t get a chance. Come on in. Martin. Martin, did you want
    to come in on Argentina? Martin Canasberger (phonetic), can you hear me? I
    thought I saw your hand raised, Martin. You\’re having trouble so, okay.
    We\’ll come back to Martin.

    I\’m going to turn to Maoling I think has a question on China. Martin, I\’ll
    come back to you. I see your. Maoling?

    QUESTIONER: Hi. Thank you, Gerry, very much for taking my question. I want
    to ask about the Chinese economy because it has been hurt badly by the
    lockdowns related to COVID-19. I was wondering whether the IMF has some
    suggestions for Chinese policy makers in terms of how to handle the economy
    under the current circumstances.

    MR. RICE: Thank you, Maoling. I heard you loud and clear. I also heard an
    echo of myself. I hope everything — I hope you\’re able to hear things
    clearly, everybody. If you have a problem, let me know. And Martin, I\’ll
    try and come back to you.

    On Maoling\’s question about China, and she was asking about the economic
    impact of the lockdowns and IMF\’s ongoing advice on the economy. So,
    clearly, a key issue in the short term, given the large impact the recent
    lockdowns had on economic activity in China, is for macroeconomic policy to
    step up and meet the challenge of the slowing growth momentum that we are
    seeing in China. And in that context, we welcome the shift to a more
    expansionary fiscal policy this year.

    But even more support would help counter the ongoing growth slowdown. This
    fiscal support would be particularly effective, in our view, if focused on
    vulnerable households through transfers and strengthening of the social
    protection system. In addition, given low core inflation and a still
    negative output gap, our view is that the Peoples Bank of China should
    continue to provide monetary support. The reduction in key policy rates
    earlier this year helps lower borrowing costs, strengthens investment. It\’s
    a welcome step towards interest rate based accommodative policy.

    But, — and coming a bit more directly to your question, Maoling — but the
    lockdowns also emphasize the importance of continuing to adjust China\’s
    zero-COVID strategy. In particular, mitigating the disruption to economic
    activity from COVID would require ramping up booster shots and targeting
    the under-vaccinated elderly. This should eventually allow adjusting the
    containment strategy to become more flexible and less restrictive. That\’s
    what I have for you, Maoling, on China.

    I am seeing Heather Scott asking about — Heather\’s got a couple of things.
    But Heather\’s asking about Sri Lanka. Heather Scott, AFP. What are the
    prospects for aid for Sri Lanka given the political upheaval? Is the Fund
    considering any emergency bridge financing to help deal with the immediate
    crisis? Sri Lanka, much in the news. Let me ask if anyone else has a
    question on Sri Lanka and I\’ll try and take a clutch of them. Matthew, hi.

    QUESTIONER: Yeah, sure. Thanks a lot. I\’ve been wanting to ask this. I
    mean, given the turmoil in the country and President — or not-President
    Gotabaya Rajapaksa now reportedly being in Singapore, I guess I wondered if
    you could specifically, what\’s the relationship? Does this have to shake
    itself out, including the Prime Minister\’s role, before the IMF can do
    anything? What is — I know you often say you won\’t speak to political
    things, but this is kind of an extraordinary situation in which, you know,
    people are swimming in the presidential swimming pool. They held a mock IMF
    session in the presidential palace.

    What is the sort of minimum of political stability that the IMF would see?
    Who are they talking to, I guess? That\’s my question on Sri Lanka.

    MR. RICE: Right. Good question. Anyone else coming in on Sri Lanka or wants
    to? Okay. Then I will take the couple of questions we have from Heather and
    from Matthew.

    So, like everyone else we are, of course, deeply concerned about the
    ongoing crisis, it\’s impact on the Sri Lankan people, and particularly the
    poor and the vulnerable groups in Sri Lanka. Again, like everyone else,
    we\’re closely monitoring the political and the social developments there.

    We hope for a resolution of the current situation that would allow for our
    resumption of a dialogue on an IMF supported program. You may recall that
    in June, less than a month ago, things are moving so fast, but less than a
    month ago there was an IMF staff team in Colombo. And we did have
    discussions, actually, constructive discussions with the authorities on a
    set of economic policies and reforms that could be supported by,
    potentially by an IMF program. We don\’t have a program with Sri Lanka right
    now. But we were discussing what could be a program.

    Clearly, the political and the social emergency situation I guess we could
    characterize it and we all see what\’s happening, you described it, Matthew,
    has, you know, interrupted those discussions and we hope to resume as soon
    as possible. In the meantime, you asked, you know, who we\’re talking to,
    Matthew. We do have technical counterparts still in, you know, some of the
    key ministries in the central bank and the Ministry of Finance. So, we are
    able to continue discussions there.

    But the, you know, the high-level discussions with the authorities that we
    would need to begin discussions on a program, we hope again, that these
    would be able to resume as soon as possible. So, you know, looking to do
    all we can in just an extraordinary difficult situation.

    Heather, I don’t have anything about emergency or bridge financing. You
    know, as I just described, we were having these discussions with Sri Lanka.
    And we hope to resume them as soon as the situation has stabilized a bit.
    And, of course, an important part of those discussions is the debt
    situation. Sri Lanka\’s public debt is assessed as unsustainable and as is
    the case with every IMF program, not just the case of Sri Lanka, for
    approval by the Board. And we are not at that stage, but for approval by
    the Board, a program would require adequate assurances on debt
    sustainability. So, that\’s what I have on this, you know, situation that\’s
    of great concern in Sri Lanka.

    Heather had a question on Pakistan. I\’m going to come back online in a
    minute. If you have a question, please raise your hand, raise your virtual
    hand. Heather\’s question on Pakistan. What\’s the status of talks? So,
    Heather, much like the case of Ghana, we issued a statement within the last
    24 hours on Pakistan. I want to refer you to that. It was that we have
    reached — the substance of it was we\’ve reached a staff level agreement
    with Pakistan, you know, it\’s been much in the news. And it\’s an agreement
    on a combined seventh and eighth review of the program that we do have with
    Pakistan that will translate into about 1.17 million being disbursed to
    Pakistan. Pretty much, straight away, and a reminder that this brings total
    disbursements from the IMF to Pakistan under the ongoing program to well
    over $4 billion, about $4.2 billion. And we\’re hoping this will help to
    stabilize the economy and amongst other things help expand the social
    safety net to protect the most vulnerable; accelerate structural reforms;
    and stabilize the macroeconomic, help stabilize the macroeconomic situation
    in Pakistan. That\’s what I have. The statement is quite substantive.

    Heather, do you want to come in on, on Pakistan, follow up. I see your hand
    raised Heather, but I do not hear you. There you are, Heather.

    QUESTIONER: Now, Gerry.

    MR. RICE: There you are. Nice. Now, I see you as well, which is terrific.
    Hi.

    QUESTIONER: Okay. Sorry about that. Yeah, that question was a little out of
    date. I gave it before the statement was issued, but I did want to follow
    up. Do we have any sense of timing on the Board meeting for that agreement?

    MR. RICE: Heather, I don\’t have anything beyond what the statement says.
    But look, as you know, the Board meeting can follow — you who follow the
    Fund, and I know you do, Heather can follow any time between three, six
    weeks, within that period could be slightly earlier, could be slightly
    later, could fall within that, but that\’s roughly the ballpark between the
    staff level agreement and then the final agreement, which comes from our
    Board.

    Okay. I\’m going to move off Pakistan. I\’m going to — Martin, I see your
    question on Argentina.

    QUESTIONER: Great.

    MR. RICE: You\’re asking about hyperinflation. Do you share the same fear?
    What do you think about the financial crisis? The huge difference, official
    alternative exchange rates. Martin, I really don\’t have much to add beyond
    what I said to other colleagues on Argentina. So, I want to acknowledge
    your question. These are important issues. They will be subjects of the
    ongoing discussions I\’m sure, but I don\’t have any specific detail on that.

    So, let me come back in the room and I see — Rodrigo, I don\’t think we
    took a question from you. David, I see you I\’ll come to you. Simon, I see
    you. I\’ll come to you. Rodrigo.

    QUESTIONER: Thank you, Gerry. I wanted to ask about Ukraine and where are
    you advising them in terms of payment of foreign debt? And is the advice
    different for the sovereign and for the SOE or is it the same?

    MR. RICE: Okay. Anyone else coming in on Ukraine? Okay. So, maybe just,
    stepping back on Ukraine, Rodrigo. We\’ve been supporting them with a
    program loan of 1.4 billion. We\’ve supported them from the SDR, their SDR
    allocation. We\’ve established the administered account, what we call
    administered account from donors to support Ukraine. Canada, Germany, the
    Netherlands have all stepped in so far. We\’re expecting more in the coming
    days. We attended the Ukraine Recovery Conference, which focused more on
    the reconstruction. At the moment, Ukraine is servicing its debt in an
    orderly way. And we would expect that to continue. So, just to respond to
    your question, what we\’re also saying is that what we see as the priority
    in terms of financing for Ukraine right now is grant financing in the
    immediate and the short-term. That\’s the best form of assistance that can
    be provided by the international community, in light of the war situation
    and the nature of the shock. And that would allow the Ukrainian Government
    to remain operational without incurring further debt, which is an important
    dimension of the question you asked.

    QUESTIONER: Sorry. So, there\’s no recommendation on requesting payment
    freezes or anything like that?

    MR. RICE: No, I don\’t have anything beyond Rodrigo of what I just said.
    Okay?

    QUESTIONER: Thank you, Gerry.

    MR. RICE: Thank you. David, did you want to come in on something else or
    are you okay, David Lawder?

    QUESTIONER: No, Gerry I\’m okay. We\’ve got a lot to get through here before
    10:30. Thanks.

    MR. RICE: You do. Thank you, David. Appreciate it. Simon?

    QUESTIONER: Thank you, Gerry, for this question again. I would like to ask
    you two question. One on Angola, if you can access the state of the Angolan
    economy. I noticed recently you had a projection growth of about 3 percent,
    and on the upcoming IMF, World Bank Annual Meetings. I don\’t know if you
    can tell us more how many delegates do you expect? Is there any change? Do
    you anticipate any change from 2019 when it was last done in-person? Thank
    you.

    MR. RICE: Thanks Simon. Simon, I\’ll need to come back to you on Angola, and
    we will come back to you immediately after the press briefing. Okay. I\’m
    not up to date myself on Angola, but it\’s a good question and we will come
    back to you after the press briefing.

    On the Annual Meetings. Simon, again, they’re going to be in-person for the
    first time since the pandemic. And we are certainly hoping that as many of
    our member countries will be represented in-person as is possible. We\’re
    all monitoring the situation with COVID. We see how it\’s dynamic to say the
    least, but we have a plan, and we have an objective and an aspiration. And
    that aspiration is that we will see our member countries to the greatest
    extent possible in-person in Washington, in October. That\’s what I have on
    that.

    Anyone else looking to come in, because, if not, then I\’ll take the last
    question, which is from David Herblings on Bloomberg. And David\’s asking
    about Kenya. What\’s the status on additional funding? Are they considering
    a waiver of conditions such as Kenya requested, including established a
    government’s central payroll inflation target? It\’s a pretty detailed
    question, David. I can really only answer pretty broadly on Kenya, which is
    that we are scheduled, our Board, is scheduled to discuss Kenya\’s third
    review under the IMF program arrangements on July 18th. So, that\’s Monday,
    and we will be able to give you more detail on what you\’re asking after
    that meeting. We have commended the Kenyan authorities\’ strong program
    commitment. Actions to, in response to external challenges. And the
    program, as I say, supports those objectives, including to put debt on a
    downward trajectory and demobilizing taxes, spending wisely will create
    space to meet social and development needs. The program includes specific
    actions to promote transparency, reduce the risk of corruption, and so on.
    So, I guess my message is David sit tight. The Board is meeting on Monday,
    and we will have more thereafter, including publication of the full report
    that the Board looks at on Monday. As always, we will publish that and I\’m
    sure a lot of the details that you\’re asking about will be in that report.

    So, with that we have hit the 10:30 hour almost. I want to thank you for
    joining us today. We will not have another press conference before the
    Board recess that I mentioned, first two weeks of August, but there will be
    a full-fledged press conference from the IMF on July 26th on the WEO update
    led by Pierre Olivier Gourinchas. I know many of you will be, looking
    forward to that. Stay safe and well everyone, and look forward to seeing
    you all soon. Bye-bye.

    * * * * *

     

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Nicolas Mombrial

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson








    Source link

  • Transcript of the October 2022 Middle East and Central Asia Department Press Briefing


    Transcript of October 2022 Middle East and Central Asia Department Press Briefing







    October 13, 2022
















    Speakers:

    JIHAD AZOUR,
    Director of Middle East and Central Asia Department, IMF

    WAFA AMR,
    Senior Communications Officer, IMF

    MS. AMR:
    Good morning. Thank you all for joining us for the press briefing on the
    Middle East and Central Asia Regional Economic Outlook. I’m Wafa Amr, from
    the Communications Department. It’s really very nice to see you here in
    person again. We have with us Jihad Azour, Director of the Middle East and
    Central Asia Department, and he will start with opening remarks. We do have
    interpretation into Arabic. Thank you, Jihad, please go ahead.

    MR. AZOUR:
    Thank you very much, Wafa. Also, good morning and welcome to the 2022 IMF
    Annual Meetings. We are glad to have you back here. It’s always a pleasure
    to have this in-person meetings. Before answering your questions, I would
    like to make a few remarks about the economic outlook for both the Middle
    East and Central Asia region, and I will start with MENA, and then Central
    Asia.

    The region is being hit by a confluence of shocks. Global slowdowns still
    high in volatile food and energy prices, and faster and stronger tightening
    of global financial conditions. Nonetheless, economic activity in the
    region has been resilient thus far, with multispeed recovery continuing in
    2022; and we project that the region will grow at 5 percent this year, up
    from 4.1 percent in 2021. However, the worsening of global conditions will
    weigh on the outlook for next year with growth slowing to 3.6 percent.
    Growth is projected at 5.2 percent this year for the oil exporters, with
    high oil prices and robust non-oil GDP growth of setting the global
    headwinds. However, economic activity in these countries is expected or so
    to slow next year as OPEC-plus production cuts, and oil price decline, and
    global demand is expected to slow.

    In contrast, the region’s emerging market and middle-income economies are
    facing a deep term-of-trade shock, weakening of global demand, and tighter
    financial conditions, which could translate into higher government service
    debt and worsening of debt dynamics. The real GDP is foreseen to grow at
    4.9 percent this year, up from 3.6 percent last year, with an acceleration
    mainly driven by Egypt’s performance during the fiscal year 2022 before
    slowing to 3.9 percent in 2023.

    Meanwhile, low-income countries are struggling with high commodity prices,
    limited progress in vaccination rollouts, and country-specific fragilities.
    Accordingly, growth in low-income countries will remain weak at just 0.8
    percent this year.

    Inflation continued to increase and has become now broad-based. Headline
    inflation in MENA is projected at 14.2 percent, on average, for this year,
    and expected to remain elevated in 2023.

    Now, let me turn to the outlook for Caucasus and Central Asia. The adverse
    impact of the war in Ukraine on the Caucasus and Central Asia economies has
    been milder so far. Relative to the latest forecast in April, the CCA
    growth for 2022 has been revised up by 1.2 percentage points to 3.8 percent
    this year. Robust growth in the first half reflects a smaller than expected
    contraction in Russia, robust foreign exchange inflows, as well as
    resilient trade.

    Still, uncertainty remains very high. CCA countries are exposed to
    spillover from the war through trade, tourism, remittances, and financial
    channels, with economic activity likely to be increasingly affected as
    sanctions remain in place for an extended period. The full growth is
    projected to slow to 3.5 percent over the medium term, which is
    significantly below the region’s historical average of almost 7 percent.

    Headline inflation, which has accelerated despite recent monetary policy
    tightening, is projected to remain in double digits at 12.9 percent this
    year, and 10.5 percent in 2023.

    I would like to say a few words about the risks to our outlook, and there
    are many. As I have mentioned, and as you will hear throughout the Annual
    Meetings, global growth has slowed, and risks are extraordinarily high. Let
    me highlight some of the key risks that are relevant to the outlook of the
    region. One, persistently high commodity prices and pervasive food
    shortages remain a top concern. Amid low strategic food reserves, rising
    fertilizer costs could present risks to 2023 agricultural harvest, reducing
    food security and potentially raising social tensions.

    Another concern is the potential for tighter than expected financial
    conditions that could tip the balance toward financial instability and debt
    distress in certain cases.

    Three, broadening inflation is also a concern, as it may require deeper
    disinflationary policies, which have the potential to be more costly than
    expected. And the question now is what countries across both MENA and CCA
    need to prioritize.

    First, countries should seek to restore price stability while, at the same
    time, protecting vulnerables, preserving fiscal sustainability while
    maintaining social stability, and also ensure food and energy security, and
    manage lingering pandemic-related risks.

    Two, the worsening of global environment, as well as also the tightening of
    macroeconomic policies, and the limited policy space in several countries
    raise the urgency of pressing ahead with structural reforms to bolster
    economic growth while transforming economies to become more resilient,
    sustainable, and diversified, as well as also becoming more inclusive.

    We’ll explore the outlook, the risks, and policy priorities of both regions
    in greater depth when we launch our Regional Economic Outlook in Dubai
    later this month and then in Uzbekistan, in some account, in early
    November. At those events, we will also discuss the two analytical chapters
    for this REO that are dedicated to the fiscal implication of surging
    commodity prices in the case of MENA countries, and the distributional
    impact of Russia’s war in Ukraine on the CCA.

    Before opening the floor to questions, I would like to underscore the IMF
    continued commitment to supporting countries throughout the region, and
    this through policy advice, technical assistance, where we are scaling up
    our support both for MENA and CCA with a new center in Kazakhstan, and in
    many cases, financial support. Since the outbreak of the COVID crisis, the
    IMF has supported both MENA and CCA, plus Afghanistan and Pakistan with
    US$21.3 billion in financing. And, in addition, in 2021, we provided,
    through the SDR allocation, additional boost to reserves by US$49 billion.

    Again, thank you very much for joining us here in Washington, and also for
    those who are online, I would like to welcome you, and I would be happy to
    take your questions.

    MS. AMR:
    Thank you, Jihad. For journalists online, please send your questions to the
    press center. We’ll start here with you. Yes, please, go ahead.

    QUESTIONER:

    Hello. Thank you, Mr. Jihad. Thank you, Ms. Wafa. I — my name is Ahmad
    Yacoub. I am the Managing Editor of Al-Ahram — Egyptian Newspaper. My
    question is about the Egyptian affairs and the cooperation between Egypt
    and the International Monetary Fund. I would like to ask about the latest
    developments of the negotiations between Egypt and the IMF, concerning the
    loan, and total size of the loan, and the economic prospects about Egypt,
    in terms of growth rate in the current fiscal year and the upcoming fiscal
    year, and the inflation rate, how we can deal with the inflation rate right
    now, and a time of approval of the new loan for Egypt. Thank you.

    MS. AMR:
    Thank you. We do have several journalists wanting to ask about Egypt. So,
    shall we take all the questions, first, on Egypt?

    MR. AZOUR:
    Yes, please.

    QUESTIONER:
    I will ask in Arabic. I am an anchor in the Egyptian television. I will
    speak about something different from what my colleague has said. Some of
    the issues that have been raised, there are very tight conditions to
    provide the loan to Egypt and to other countries, in general. Is it
    possible to consider that the current conditions, which are very
    exceptional, and that the developing countries suffering from — in light
    of the Coronavirus and the war, does this require to lessen the conditions
    from the Fund, which would lead to increasing the price of the foreign
    currency, vis-à-vis the local currency? So, this will lead to increasing
    the burden on the vulnerable and the poor. So, some other issues that are
    required by the Fund, we may find issues in the countries. So, the
    governments try to get rid of some of their — or sell part of their share
    in the companies to the private sector. This is good, maybe, in terms of
    economy, but at the social level, it may lead to some problems. Thank you.

    MS. AMR:
    Please. There’s a microphone here.

    QUESTIONER:
    Yeah, thank you. Julian, The Africa Report. And I’m sorry if this is the
    question that he asked about. Just following up on Egypt, President Sisi
    had asked that you lift the applicable standards. It wasn’t clear what he
    was talking about. Is it subsidies? Is it, you know, the military’s
    involvement in the economy for this new IMF loan? So, if you could talk a
    little bit about that and, you know, what kind of standards you will be
    holding Egypt to, to get such a loan. Appreciate it. Thank you.

    MS. AMR:

    Thank you very much. I also want to recognize a question I got online from
    Reuters, Lewis, Aidan Lewis. And his question is, are you satisfied that
    Egypt will be able to come up with additional funding to complete the
    expected EFF Program? So, if there are no more questions on Egypt, Jihad,
    please.

    MR. AZOUR:

    Thank you very much. I will split my question into maybe English and
    Arabic. First of all, the cooperation between the IMF and Egypt is very
    strong. Since 2016, the Fund has provided, at two instances, support to
    Egypt, in order to address economic, social, and financial challenges. Back
    in the first program, we have been able, with a reform agenda that was set
    by the Egyptian Authorities to help in bringing financial stability,
    strengthening the reserves of the Central Bank, restoring growth, and
    improving economic and social conditions. Part of the original program was
    an important social pillar that had an objective in order to shield and
    protect the low-income people and provide, especially for those in the
    rural area, with direct and targeted support.

    We also took into consideration the importance of strengthening the
    competitive capacity of Egypt, through structure reform. Egypt is a country
    that has a huge potential and a very active private sector, and therefore,
    the purpose of those reforms were to accelerate growth, in order to create
    jobs. During the COVID crisis, the Fund has been very responsive in
    providing Egypt with two tranches of support, with a total amount of $8.8
    billion, in order to help Egypt address the impact of the COVID shock and
    allow the country to be better prepared to protect lives and livelihoods.

    And our support to Egypt, in terms of technical assistance, in terms of
    policy support, has been continuous, over all this period. Recently, Egypt,
    like other emerging markets, was hit by a certain number of external shocks
    that have increased the level of vulnerabilities in many emerging
    economies. And the country has been faced with a certain number of food
    security issues because of the impact of the war in Ukraine, as well as
    also some impact on remittances and to — mainly, sorry, revenues from
    tourism.

    Of course, as very strong partners, we have started, based on the request
    from the Egyptian Authority, to explore an opportunity to provide
    assistance to Egypt, in terms of a new program. This program has a certain
    number of key pillars. One is to protect Egypt from exogenous shocks, that
    there are many. And this is where the importance of adapting the monetary
    policy, to shield the economy from those external shocks. Maintain a fiscal
    discipline that is very much needed, while strengthening the social
    protection mechanisms, through the various instruments, Takaful and Karama
    and other type of instruments that have helped provide the protection for
    the low-income people.

    Of course, addressing the issue of inflation, as you see, it’s a global
    priority. And when inflation reaches double digit, it becomes an issue, not
    only for the monetary stability, but for the overall stability. But also, I
    think the role of the private sector in Egypt has proved to be very
    effective, both in terms of the competencies in the private sector and the
    ability to drive growth in the economy, over the medium term. And this is
    why there is also a certain number of important reforms, on the structural
    side, that will allow Egypt to maintain a high level of growth and address
    some of the issues that were brought in by the current exogenous shock and
    crisis.

    This is where we stand, okay? The negotiation have started, they’re
    progressing, and we will, as soon as we reach staff level agreement, we
    will inform you about the size and the content of this agreement.

    MS. AMR:
    Okay. Yes, please, go ahead here, in the front.

    QUESTIONER:
    Hi. Thank you. Cameo Shaquoia, from The Africa Bazaar. I have a question
    regarding Tunisia. As you know, the Central Bank of Tunisia recently
    increased bank fees and interest rates, hindering access to consumer loan.
    I was wondering if you could provide any updates on what the IMF is doing.
    And are you working with the Central Bank of Tunisia? And also, if you can
    provide updates on Sudan and Somalia also.

    MS. AMR:
    Thank you very much. We also have a question on Tunisia, online, from Angus
    MacDougall, Reuters. When do you expect to sign a staff level agreement
    with Tunisia? Can you outline what you expect from it?

    MR. AZOUR:

    Thank you very much. I need to answer the question, also, in Arabic. Well,
    we already had several rounds of discussion with the Tunisian Authorities,
    in the context of providing support through a new program. In the last two
    years, we provided one and a half billion dollars to Tunisia, 750
    immediately after the COVID shock, and another one of similar amount, last
    year, with the SDR allocations.

    Of course, Tunisia is a country that has been hit by the confluence of
    shocks, and the recovery in 2021 and 2022 allowed Tunisia to recover,
    partially, some of the impact of the first wave of shock, which came with
    COVID. A certain number of important reforms were already planned by the
    government and the government team, which are encouraging steps, in order
    to allow Tunisia to address their fiscal imbalances, as well as, also, to
    arrest the risk of inflation and improve economic conditions. This was
    complimented by an active social dialogue that has had the various partners
    to work together. We are also currently in negotiation with the Tunisian
    Authorities, and the negotiations are progressing. And then, again, as soon
    as an agreement is reached, we will inform you more about the detail. When
    it comes to the central bank actions, as you know, the priority, today, is
    to reduce the risk of inflation. And reducing this rate of inflation would
    require to use certain number of measures, on the interest rate side, as
    well as, also, on the provision of liquidity. And therefore, those are part
    of the instruments that the central bank usually — or could resort to, in
    order to address inflation.

    The question in Arabic is about the conditions, in fact, as it was in the
    past, currently. The program takes into consideration the social conditions
    and insists on having that the most vulnerable and marginalized segments
    are protected from any conditions or from any measures to be taken. There
    is a necessity in Egypt and in other countries to enhance the social
    protection system, in order to correct the path of subsidy, which is less
    effective because it’s the less targeted or not targeted.

    It has to be more targeted, more targeted to the segments and the groups
    that are more vulnerable to face the adverse impact of the increase of
    prices and inflation. Increase of prices and inflation impacts the
    vulnerable and those who have limited sources of income. Therefore, we also
    emphasize the importance of expanding the network of social protection and
    using the limited resources available, at the local level, which are under
    more pressures, due to having more crisis. It needs to be reformed.

    Therefore, the objective in the — of the program is, first of all, to
    maintain stability because there is no welfare without stability, no
    welfare without stability. We need to confirm and to emphasize in the light
    of the economic developments all over the world. We need to go — or
    emphasize the importance of stability on the monetary side, on the
    financial side, and with regards to inflation. These are the main
    priorities to enable the investor to increase the level of the investment
    and the citizen to be able to have purchasing power and to maintain it. And
    it — no doubt, the world is changing, and the world is changing, and these
    need — this would need adaptation from every one of us.

    Therefore, we need reforms to increase the capacity to attract investments.
    In the past, the region has attracted the flow of capitals in the form of
    portfolio investments. So, the challenge in the future would be to attract
    investments that are dyad investment that would create jobs. These
    investments, led by the private sector, and would require a number of
    environments that would incubate and flourish these investments. Therefore,
    the role of the private sector is very important. It’s fundamental and
    vital. And the country — the state has to be supporting and not competing
    with it. Therefore, we have to give space to the private sector to work and
    grow.

    MS. AMR:
    We have a question on Qatar. And the question is in Arabic. What are the
    economic prospects for Qatar, in the coming two years after the World Cup
    ends? And what are the inflation rates, currently?

    MR. AZOUR:

    Qatar has managed, in the past two years, to face the COVID crisis and
    accelerate economic development, and there were investments that were
    benefited from, in order to build and prepare for the World Cup. This has
    contributed to improving the economic activity for the non-oil sector and
    also improving recently in the oil and gas prices have also helped
    accelerating the economic flourishing.

    In the next year, we expect that to continue, we expect that that trend
    will keep. There will be improvement in growth. Also, this is due to the
    investments that are made by Qatar currently in order to enhance its
    ability to produce gas and to export it. So, we expect it to be the largest
    country exporting liquified gas, [LNG].

    In addition to all that, there was a number of measures that were taken to
    maintain the stability at the fiscal level and to enhance the ability of
    Qatar to increase the level of resource. With regards to prices overall,
    the GCC countries, because maybe due to it has a low share of food staff
    and commodities in their consumption. It was not impacted at the same level
    as other countries did from the increase of prices at the global level.

    In addition to that, there was some kind of continuity of subsidizing some
    commodities and some also measures to lessen and reduce the increase in
    prices. Therefore, the levels of inflation have remained less than they are
    globally in this region. So, we have to be cautious because there is an
    increase in inflation currently at the level of the world and in the
    region. On Somalia and Sudan.

    QUESTIONER:
    Could you remind me about the question?

    MS. AMR:
    She wanted an update on Somalia and Sudan.

    QUESTIONER:
    I have a follow-up on Tunisia. How confident are you that the government
    will implement on the reform?

    MR. AZOUR:

    Sorry, could you repeat your question?

    QUESTIONER:
    How confident are you in what the governments is currently doing in Tunisia
    right now? That they will implement the reforms? Thank you.

    MS. AMR:

    And the questions on Somalia and Sudan, were just, if you have any updates
    on those.

    MR. AZOUR:
    Well, on Somalia, as you know, in 2020, we have reached a decision point
    for the HIPC initiative. And since both the government of Somalia, as well
    as also the international community work together in order to prepare
    Somalia to reach what we call the completion point and finalize the debt
    relief operation. Government in Somalia has maintained the drive of reform
    despite the various challenges. One is the impact of Covid. Second, is the
    climate issues. As you know, Somalia is suffering at the same time from
    drought as well as also as from the flood. In addition to that, a delayed
    political process that has led recently to the election as well as also the
    appointment of new cabinet.

    Therefore, the work with Somalia is progressing, despite the challenges.
    Somalia has been able to address certain number of important challenges
    including challenges related to food security. We recommend that Somalia
    receives more grants as a support to address the food security issue,
    especially giving the dire situation and the impact of climate issues on
    Somalia.

    We expect that if things continue to move and the way they were moving
    recently and according to our plan to achieve some time at end of 2023, the
    process and reach a completion point. Sudan, as you know, the Fund has not
    suspended its engagement with Sudan. We are following up on the situation,
    especially economically and social situation that has also deteriorated
    over time. Climate did not help. The increase in price of food and food
    security issues are also issues that have delayed the process of
    progressing in the HIPC initiative. As you know, we have an ECF with Sudan
    that is expected to expire at the end of 2022.

    On Tunisia, well, one, we have to recognize that Tunisia, like several
    countries in the region have been subjected in the last two years to severe
    and successive shocks. Covid and the impact of Covid on an economy that is
    open dependent on tourism was high climate issues. And recently the
    increase in inflation, especially headline inflation, increase in price of
    food and commodities. And, therefore, the government has recently put
    together a team, and this team has managed to come up with a comprehensive
    reform program. This program is a homegrown program, and that has been
    discussed with the key stakeholders in the civil society in order to reach
    a common ground on some of those priorities. Of course, the current
    environment doesn\’t help, and therefore, in order to maintain stability and
    accelerate growth, certain number of reforms are more important than
    others.

    The Fund is supportive, has supported, as I mentioned earlier, so the case
    of Tunisia twice in the last two years. And we are actively working with
    the Tunisian authorities to find the best way to help them address those
    challenges and accelerate through the program their capacity to regain, I
    would say, their trajectory of growth.

    MS. AMR:

    Thank you. Please go, gentlemen over there. Thank you.

    QUESTIONER:
    Thank you. John Everton from the Banker. There\’s been an IMF visit to
    Lebanon recently where there was frustration expressed about the pace of
    reform there, following on from the SLA signed in April. Can you tell us
    what your thoughts are about the probability of the reforms going through
    and a wider deal being reached? Thank you.

    MS. AMR:

    Thank you very much. And we do also have another question online from
    Camille from MTV on Lebanon. How can the IMF convince leaders in Lebanon to
    implement the demands of the International Monetary Fund?

    MR. AZOUR:

    Well, first of all, as you know, we have reached staff level agreement
    after a long period of discussions and program negotiation with the
    authorities in order to help Lebanon address one of the most acute and
    severe crisis for Lebanon in a century, and one of the most complex crisis
    currently in the world. Based on this staff level agreement, there are
    certain number of measures that are needed in order to not only to have the
    program becoming effective, but also, to jump start reforms the Lebanese
    economy.

    What are those measures? One is to pass a budget, which is an important and
    basic milestones. This is your baseline year. Two is to address the issues
    related to trust and confidence. And this is why certain number of measures
    like the Bank Secrecy Law, as well as also, some reforms that are needed to
    strengthen transparency and fight corruption. Those are very important to
    restore confidence. Address the issue of the losses of the financial sector
    that we are accumulated and are preventing Lebanon from the recovery, and
    also, constitute the major liability on the balance sheet of the state.

    Those are important steps in order to allow the program to start, as I
    said, and also to allow Lebanon to start the recovery and strengthen the
    support of the international community. Progress has been made, but
    progress has been slow. Only few measures have been so far implemented and
    there is still progress on others.

    The Fund remains committed to support Lebanon as our Managing Director
    mentioned earlier today, but I think it\’s very important for those basic
    measures to be implemented and implemented on time, especially that Lebanon
    is also subjected to other type of shocks. Food and food security issue is
    an issue that Lebanon is facing in a very acute way. And some assistance
    was provided by the World Bank and others to help Lebanon.

    In addition, also to the risk in terms of brain drain and other issues that
    Lebanon is facing. We encourage the authorities to accelerate and pursue
    those needed measures in order to have the program come into effect.

    MS. AMR:

    Thank you, Jihad. We do have questions online. Mohmmad Aluban from Jordan’s
    mamlaka TV. With the launch of economic reforms in Jordan. How will Jordan
    overcome the problems of unemployment and poverty? And how can it reduce
    the size of its large debt? Does the IMF have a new cooperation with Jordan
    to support food security in the country?

    MR. AZOUR:
    The Fund and Jordan have worked together in the last two years to help
    Jordan mitigate the successive shock. We adjusted the program we had signed
    with Jordan back in 2020 to provide the Jordanian authorities with the
    capacity to respond to the Covid shock by allowing additional flexibility
    on the fiscal management. And this was very helpful and allowed the
    Jordanian government to save more lives and address livelihood of the
    population. Over the last two years, Jordan was able to implement important
    reforms that allowed Jordan to maintain its macroeconomic stability despite
    the severe external shocks and the challenges that the Jordanian economy is
    facing like other economies in the region. This is, of course, something
    that allowed the Jordanian to maintain the confidence of investors and keep
    inflation under control. Of course, like other parts of the world, the
    Covid crisis has left important scars and one of them is on the level of
    unemployment. Jordan had in the past an issue with youth unemployment and
    this has been made more challenging with the Covid crisis. The best way to
    address it, and this is the gist of our discussion with the authorities in
    the context of the program that we still have with Jordan is how we
    accelerate structural reforms. How we reduce cost of labor, how we reduce
    the cost of energy, in order to allow the private sector to have a better
    competitive position in order to invest and grow. Also, investing in
    improving fiscal management is also a way for Jordan to keep not only its
    public finance under control but also to provide confidence especially for
    a country that has already high level of debt. Last but not the least there
    are certain number of transformative projects that Jordan is currently
    considering that will help improve business environment and we hope that
    those projects will allow Jordan to address gradually the issue of
    unemployment which I think this is one of our two key priorities for the
    region is how to address unemployment, women’s participation in the economy
    on one hand and also how to protect the population from the shock of
    prices, price of food, price of fuel, and gas, and also the increase of
    price of interest. Those are important shocks, exogenous shocks, that we
    are working with the region, not only through financial support but also
    through policy consultation and technical assistance to help them act very
    quickly and swiftly to address those weaknesses and allow them to on one
    hand protect their economies and benefit from the capacity to recovery.

    MS. AMR:

    Thank you, Jihad. We do have a question on Pakistan, two questions,
    actually, from Iram Abbasi from Voice of America. Will the IMF consider
    rescheduling debt to Pakistan amid devastation due to floods if asked by
    the Pakistani government? On Pakistan, Pakistan’s Finance Minister is
    [inaudible) request, will the IMF grant some relief to Pakistan in terms of
    repayment? The second question is on fuel prices in Pakistan. They have
    been reduced. Do you think it’s a violation of the IMF deal? Also, how
    confident you are with the current government to fulfill its commitments to
    the IMF?

    MR. AZOUR:

    Thank you, Wafa. Of course, we were saddened by the loss of human as well
    as also livelihood in Pakistan with the flood and we presented, and we
    reiterate our condolences for the people of Pakistan. As you know, the Fund
    has been very supportive to Pakistan over the last period. We have a
    program with Pakistan that has been extended and increased in size. This is
    to help Pakistan deal with the confluence of shocks starting with the Covid
    crisis where we provided additional flexibility.

    We accelerated some of our disbursement to recently the exogenous shocks
    and the shock of increase in price of food and commodity. We had recently
    completed a review that provided Pakistan with $1.2 billion and hopefully
    we will be fielding a mission in November after the annual meetings to
    Pakistan in order to start with the authorities preparing for the next
    review. We are waiting currently for the assessment of the damages that
    World Bank and UNDP are conducting in order to see what are on one hand the
    repercussions on public finance and the impact on the economy and on the
    society.

    Based on this assessment, we will need to update our numbers and based on
    our discussion with the authorities, we will also listen to them to see
    what are their priorities, and how the Fund can help. Of course, on the
    issue of subsidy, as in other parts of the world, subsidy that is targeted
    to support certain items has proved not to be very effective. I would say
    it has proved to be very regressive. And in our regional economic outlook
    we are again looking at this issue that is showing that this is not the
    best way to use the very limited fiscal space that exists. Therefore, we
    are encouraging Pakistan as well as also other countries to move from an
    untargeted subsidy that is a waste of resources and to dedicate those
    resources to those who need it. I give you one simple example. The region
    spends on social protection 2 percent of GDP and in certain cases what
    countries are spending on subsidies could be the double of that.

    Therefore, it’s very important to use this moment where challenges are
    mounting, where increase in prices is hurting, to reallocate the resources
    for those who need it most. And this is something that it’s not, I would
    say, part of the IMF conditionalities, this is part of what is needed in
    order to provide the right protection for those who need it at the time
    where inflation is very high.

    MS. AMR:
    Thank you, Jihad. Do we have any questions in the room? Yes, please, go
    ahead.

    QUESTIONER:
    Yes, thank you. Julian Pecquet, from The Africa Report. Just had a
    follow-up question on Sudan, so if I heard you right, you said that you
    have not suspended your assistance. I’m wondering, you know, how that’s
    consistent with your push for a good governance after the coup and also a
    number of other countries have suspended aid, have suspended debt relief.
    As you probably know, the Sudanese finance minister is here making the
    rounds, saying that that is undermining the country’s economic reforms. I
    would love to get your thoughts on that. Thank you.

    MR. AZOUR:

    In the context of the ACF, we have not suspended the relationship with
    Sudan, but, as you know, we are having limited engagement with the Sudanese
    authorities. We are following up on the situation, especially on the
    economic and social situation that has deteriorated over the last year
    because of confluence of issues. Of course, the HIPC process is a milestone
    type of process, it’s not a time-bound process.

    There are certain number of important reforms and measures that need to be
    implemented and that we are part of the program itself in order for Sudan
    to reach what we call the completion point and have the debt relief
    concluded. We have last year with the support of the international
    community reached an important milestone with what we call the decision
    point for one of the largest, I would say maybe the largest operation of
    debt relief.

    We urge the authorities to accelerate both the reform agenda and the
    transition in order to address the issues that have been compounded with
    the food security shock, the climate issues, as well as also the social
    deterioration.

    MS. AMR:

    Thank you. We have one last question online from Bahrain. How do you see
    possible global recession impacting the Gulf States?

    MR. AZOUR:
    Well, the global recession is affecting countries in the region in
    different ways because it is accompanied with increase in oil price and
    commodities and for all exporting countries that has compensate for the
    impact of increase in interest rates as well as also the potential or the
    current slowdown that we see globally. In addition to that, countries in
    the GCC were able to maintain lower level of inflation and have kept the
    reform programs that they have started and that have helped them diversify
    their source of revenues and not to go into, I would say, prosecutorial
    policies. These have helped increase their reserves, strengthen their both
    current account and fiscal accounts and reduce any pressure on markets. In
    addition to that, some countries have already with the level of reserves
    accumulated will be in less need for borrowing going forward in the
    markets.

    MS. AMR:

    Thank you very much, Jihad. This concludes our Press Briefing for the
    Middle East and Central Asia Regional Economic Outlook. I would like to
    thank you and all the journalists joining virtually for joining us. I would
    like to remind you that the report for the Regional Economic Outlook will
    be published on October 31st and please do join our Western Hem press
    briefing at 3:00 p.m. today and the Asia Press Briefing at 7:00 p.m. today.
    Thank you all again.


    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Wafa Amr

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson








    Source link