Parvez Elahi, the president of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, has been granted a two-day physical remand by an Islamabad anti-terrorism court (ATC) in a new terror case dating back to March 18. This comes just a day after Elahi was released by the Islamabad High Court (IHC) but then re-arrested by the police. Elahi has been arrested a total of 11 times since June as part of a crackdown on the PTI following violence on May 9. The police claim that Elahi was detained in a case registered at the Counter Terrorism Department (CTD) police station. Elahi’s lawyers argued against the 14-day physical remand and urged the court to discharge him from the case, but their plea was rejected. Elahi alleges that he was kept at the Crime Investigation Agency police station all night and criticized the police’s actions. The Lahore High Court (LHC) issued a show-cause notice for contempt of court to the Islamabad Chief Commissioner (CC) Mohammad Anwarul Haq. The LHC had ordered Elahi’s release on September 1, but he was arrested again on the same day. Elahi’s wife filed a habeas corpus petition, which the LHC dismissed as infructuous. The court noted that the only action that could be taken was contempt of court proceedings against the police officers involved. Elahi’s lawyers argued that his arrest and detention violated court orders. The Islamabad advocate general informed the court that the city police chief could not attend the hearing as he had to appear before the Supreme Court, and CC Haq had been summoned by the IHC. The judge said that the court would look into the matter. The advocate general stated that Elahi had been arrested in Islamabad’s territory and that it did not fall under the court’s jurisdiction. The judge noted that Elahi was incarcerated in the Atotock district jail, so the LHC heard the case. The advocate general confirmed that Elahi had been taken to the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Pims) and then the Islamabad Police Lines. The judge emphasized the importance of implementing court orders and encouraged the advocate general to challenge the court order if he had any objections.

>Source link>

>>Join our Facebook Group be part of community. <<

By hassani

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *